Terror attack!
by Jay Stevens
Dig this:
Gee. A terror plot involving Christian radicals. Imagine that. And to think I got jumped yesterday (and today) in email and attempted nasty, unprintable comments for expressing concern as to whether or not the bombs seized in Alabama involved white supremacists, and today we read about a terrorist plot against a woman’s clinic that was supposed to take place on American soil – planned out by ……………… Christian radicals.
You idiots on the wingnut right who only see the media and ‘Islamofacists’ as the “real” enemy ever gonna get a clue? Ever going to get beyond slamming people for rightly worrying that an explosion or a thwarted plot is the work of an Christofascist? Was your first thought today when you heard about this plot was that it was a “Islamic” plot? I wonder which one of the righty ‘nuts declared the news of this thwarted plot as ‘overblown’ first?
Ever since I saw the newstory about the clinic bomb, I’ve been wanting to take a rightie rant about terrorists and do a find-and-replace. I didn’t have to wait long, thanks to the idiots who wanted to shoot up a military base.
Basically I took “Sista Toldja”’s hysteria-laden post about a “Islamic militant terror plot” to attack Fort Dix, and replaced a few key words and links.
Not to downplay the Fort Dix gang…yet, but the administration does have a history of passing off less-than-dangerous and less-than-organized plots as proof of a world-wide organized Islamic terror threat. What’s already known is that the Fort Dix six were not affiliated with any known terrorist group.
Were they dangerous? Of course, just like any other group of alienated twenty-somethings with assault rifles. (See, “Shootings, Virginia Tech,” for more details.)
But what’s not in doubt is that they were nowhere near as well-organized or had as much history of violence as anti-abortion clinic bombers and militia groups, both mentioned in the links above.
My point is that terrorism isn’t inherently Islamic – or even religious — or the purveyance of dark-skinned illegal immigrants. To simplify the problem to a set of preprogrammed ideological values only diminishes the complexity of the problem.
I’m happy the Fort Dix six were caught before they could act – I’m especially happy for the soldiers stationed and training there – but let’s not pretend they’re the vanguard of an “invasion” of Islamic radicals or something, eh? There are plenty of violent loonies right here at home we need to deal with.
May 8, 2007 at 8:34 pm
Spot on, Jay! The news is full of fake stories about death and destruction and misplaced blame. Here’s a whopper for you from earlier today:
“In case you missed it, this week, there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died – an entire town destroyed. Turns out that the National Guard in Kansas only had 40 percent of its equipment and they are having to slow down the recovery process in Kansas.”
–B. Hussein Obama,
Democratic Presidential Candidate,
quoted by The Associated Press
[Actual death toll = 12]
May 8, 2007 at 9:37 pm
Er…
(a) Non sequitor.
(b) Highlighting Obama’s middle name kinda makes you look like a jerk.
(c) Obviously a slip of the tongue; only relevant if Obama had a history of being oblivious to current events, or, say, if he had been personally responsible for flubbing rescue efforts.
May 9, 2007 at 1:04 pm
Just jerking your chain, Jay. The papers are full of exaggerated nonsense.
But I didn’t “highlight” Obama’s middle name. The trend in names for very important people–such as doctors, and lawyers, and even dentists–is first name initial, full middle name, last name. For example, F. James Wilson, DDS. (But hey, it’s not my problem you’re sensitive about Obama being a Muslim. That kind of makes you look like a sensitive jerk, not to mention a bigot.)
“Mission accomplished!” That was obviously a “slip of the tongue,” eh, Jay?
Now here is what you missed: The overwhelming preponderance of terrorist attacks in the world today are carried out by Muslims. Trying to get us to worry about Christian terrorists or other types of terrorists is simply a red herring. It is like seeing the world overrun with rattlesnakes but saying we should look at the spiders. You ought to work for the TSA and do body cavity searches on little white grandmothers.
Talk about a “non sequitor.” [non sequitur :) ]
May 9, 2007 at 4:11 pm
Generally, I call people what they call themselves. I’m not senstivie to Obama’s little foray into Islam, that’s his own business. But I am sensitve about folks making too big a deal about a candidate’s religion. You won’t find me getting hysterical about Romney’s Mormonism, tho’ some leftys do. IMHO it’s irrelevant. (I take that back. Now if a candidate worshipped the Great Spaghetti Monster, that’d be a big plus in my book!)
And don’t play coy. You know why calling Obama “B. Hussein Obama” is infammatory and irrelevant.
I’m not sure about your statement that most terror globally is Islamic. There’s the Basques, Balkans, and Africa. And here at home white supremacists and militia groups are a clear and present danger. They’re here, they’re armed. I’m not sure who are seen as the bigger threat, but I know for a fact that national security analysts are deeply concerned with these groups.
May 9, 2007 at 5:02 pm
On the religion factor: You can be open-minded all you want about the religion of a presidential candidate, but if you think a non-Christian is going to get elected, you are sadly naive. The odds are overwhelmingly against it. If I am not mistaken, 100 percent of all presidents have been Christians of one stripe or another, perhaps with a closet atheist here or there. And I believe the same is true for all vice presidents.
In the case of Obama, I don’t think anyone can say with certainty what religion he really is, what nationality he really claims, which father he calls his own, or even what race he belongs to. They guy is a total political disaster anyway you look at him.
Do you have any idea why the Democrats are doing this to themselves?
May 9, 2007 at 5:37 pm
Er…sorry, I’m going to let those comments wither away…
May 9, 2007 at 6:10 pm
Politics is a tough subject—like reality. There is what you want to believe, and then there is what is. No fainting or withering away allowed, Jay.
Read the Boston Globe yesterday on Obama. (“President Obama? Not this time.”)
The writer, Alex Beam, thinks a lot like you do, but he has started slapping himself in the head lately.
May 9, 2007 at 6:44 pm
I may agree that Obama won’t win the nomination — that’s why we hold elections, to see who wins — but the laundry list you gave me…we don’t know his religion, his father, his country, blah blah blah — I mean what candidate can’t you say that about?
Every politician has a personal and political side with a gap between the two, and frankly every accusation yet made against Obama about his religion, his past, his race — none of it seems to have mattered at all. It doesn’t stick.
Obama has taken the lead over Hilary in the polls despite all the focus and intensity and the hits on him by the media. He’s outraising her, he’s organizing better, he’s got next to no unfavorable rating…
In fact the hysteria from the right — the ridiculous accusations about him really being a Muslim, didn’t you know?, the repulsive commentary on Obama by Rush, the legless real estate transaction “scandal” — all points to an intense fear that Obama is, in fact, a great candidate.
Now it’s Hiliary is the “professional politician willing to play dirty and Obama is too nice” meme? Man, that article was a stretch… comparing Obama to Tsongas?
May 9, 2007 at 10:31 pm
I wasn’t speaking rhetorically about Obama’s background. He has a black father from Africa (Kenya) who deserted the family when Obama was two years old; an Asian stepfather from Indonesia (Jakarta) who apparently raised him as a Muslim, and a white mother from Kansas (Wichita) who might have been involved in some kind of scam to obtain US citizenship for one or both of her husbands. Now, after admitting to using soft and hard drugs, he claims to be a Christian, but he is attending a notoriously radical and racist black church.
“What candidate can’t you say that about?” I can’t think of any presidential candidate that I can say that about.
As for Obama being a “great candidate” because right-wingers don’t like him, that is no way to rigorously assess his chances for success.