by jhwygirl
Back just before the election, the Bush Administration announced it would be creating a 2nd interagency group for bison management. That happened on October 29th, and I have to say I was perplexed. The announcement was cryptic – it didn’t really explain whether it was related to the Yellowstone/Montana/Wyoming issues concerning brucellosis – and beyond that, to manage the genetic diversity of bison, the government – whether it be the State of Montana or the Federal Government – can’t be out there sanctioning widespread slaughter of bison under the current interagency bison management plan while another group is out there supposedly trying to preserve genetic diversity.
I wasn’t the only one confused.
In other developments…
Montana FWP has extended the comment period for its draft environmental assessment that would establish a 30-year grazing restriction and bison access agreement with the Royal Teton Ranch outside of Gardiner Montana. The agreement would allow grazing of bison on the ranch, at a cost of $300,000. Bison that leave the park, and often end up on the ranch, would be spared slaughter.
Because slaughtering bison, you know, to manage brucellosis, makes sense, don’t you know?
I mean – just the title of the interagency agreement – the Interagency Bison Management Plan – shows the ignorance in addressing the problem the agreement was initiated to address……
…but I digress….
Meanwhile, on the west side of the park, near West Yellowstone, an agreement is being hammered out that would allow bison to graze near what was the site of last years capture-n-take-’em-to-slaughter facility at Horse Butte. A series of meetings held between state and federal officials over the last few months is expected to result in a formal adoption of the plan next month in Helena. The result would be that bison should be able to roam in and out of the park without slaughter.
Horse Butte is pretty important for bison and preserving their genetic diversity
Still more….
Montana’s state veterinarian Marty Zaluski announced that the governor’s plan to establish a special management zone around the park, designed to restore Montana’s brucellosis-free status and reduce livestock testing costs state-wide, is garnering nationwide support.
Five American Indian groups are seeking to obtain a herd of about 40 bison that have been held in captivity since this past spring – bison that left the park boundaries. These bison have been repeatedly tested, but have not shown signs of brucellosis. The genetics of the Yellowstone bison – Bison bison – are considered superior, and the 5 groups want to use this herd to help bolster the genetics of their own herds who graze amongst domestic cattle. The tribes have until the end of November to submit plans.
Wyoming, which had a cow test positive for brucellosis this past June, has been spared losing its brucellosis- free status. All cattle and adjacent herds that had been tested have been clean.
Anyways..there it is folks – if you got more information, please add it to the comments. I’m cautiously optimistic that the lunacy massive slaughter that we saw of bison last winter may not have to occur this upcoming winter.
How these steps will affect ranchers – both in management and cost – I’ve yet to see much in terms of specifics. The idea of having that second management zone was to isolate costs. How that will translate to what it will mean – or won’t – to those ranchers is at question…and I’m betting I’m not the only one wondering.
Maybe the state can take the money it spent in snowmobiles and labor and gas and pre-mix and trucks and capture facilities and every other bit of the nonsense and put it onto funding the vaccination program that would be imminent.
November 17, 2008 at 11:56 pm
Thanks for getting Paulson off the top of the queue, I was scured.
As for the bison thing–you can’t false start your way to a safety, but if someone hikes the ball, they’re in trouble.
November 18, 2008 at 10:40 am
A bit more info about that Royal Teton Ranch/Church Universal & Triumphant “deal”–that $300,000 and the EA is just for FWP’s role in this boondoggle–for the installation of fences and such, and as we all know, fences are just so darned beneficial to migrating wildlife. From a 10/14 FWP news release:
“BOZEMAN-Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks is seeking public comment on a draft environmental assessment for a proposal to enter into a 30-year grazing restriction and bison access agreement with the Royal Teton Ranch and contribute $300,000 to the cost of the agreement.”
You can view the EA here http://fwp.mt.gov/publicnotices/notice_1895.aspx.
From Buffalo Field Campaign:
“Your public comments are needed by 5:00 pm, Friday, November 21, 2008, on the so-called land deal – a 30-year lease of grazing rights from the Royal Teton Ranch – between state and federal agencies, some conservation groups, and the Church Universal & Triumphant (CUT). If this land lease goes through, CUT will receive more millions for leasing their land for a mere 30 years so that a handful of captured, tested, and tagged bison could temporarily occupy portions of their native range outside Yellowstone’s north boundary. Over the years, thousands of wild bison have been slaughtered for even looking in the direction of these lands. Back in 1998-99, $13 million U.S. tax dollars were spent to allow wild bison and other migratory wildlife safe passage through this critical corridor, but to date, bison have been repeatedly harassed and killed for attempting to access these lands. Now, the agencies involved are touting it as a huge step forward, when, in reality, it is a corridor to nowhere with only 25 buffalo gaining temporary access to it and only after being run through the typical buffalo torture gauntlet of capture, testing, telemetry device implants, and tagging.” http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/media/update0809/110908.html
It’s just another bogus chapter in a bogus but lucrative mismanagement scheme…where wild bison and the American taxpayers get screwed. Even sadder is the fact that certain “conservation groups” jump onboard and tout it as a great step forward when it’s actually a shameful step backwards–a mere 25 bison whose essential wildness has been compromised get to use this land temporarily, for HOW many millions in taxpayer dollars? Many of us requested that FWP extend the comment period deadline, and they complied, so come on, Montanans, read up on it and let them know how you feel about additional hundreds of thousands of dollars being poured into this black hole of bison abuse.
November 18, 2008 at 9:21 pm
“mismanagement scheme” – soooooo true.
Thanks for the clarification.
When I read the plan and saw that it was for a maximum of 25 bison daily, I kinda wondered what was the point. MT is essentially paying $30,000 a year to winter graze 25 bison a day?
Quite the profit – I doubt grazing fees on federal lands even get within sight of costs.
Do you know more on the specifics of the agreement for Horse Butte?
You know – the whole thing is that managing bison is NOT managing brucellosis. If Montana wants to manage them as game animals, that’s one thing – but if they’re going to do that, they need to also provide funding for habitat and research, etc., of the species – just like they do for other game animals. What they’re doing now is patently and ethically wrong.
There is something morally wrong with killing an unlimited number of bison, based on nothing more than unsubstantiated fear.
November 19, 2008 at 8:57 pm
I’m always cautious about stating what I know, since what I know about this complex issue is quite iffy. The Horse Butte proposal–to allow unlimited numbers of bison winter access to Horse Butte–is not final until next month, as noted above. The important thing to realize here is, as it stands now, this isn’t a permanent habitat fix (as it should be). Certainly winter access is something, sure beats getting helicopter & snowmobile hazed to exhaustion through impossibly deep snow, or chased out onto thin ice where you and your herdmates break through and die a desperate death in freezing water, eh? Year-round access to HB is what’s needed and is easily attainable, since the butte is cattle-free public land with some bison-friendly residents mixed in. But already livestock industry mouthpieces are blathering about how this is a de facto expansion of the nat’l park…I guess we’ll have to wait and see. If we’re talking winter access only, does that mean we can expect the Springtime Hazing Follies right on schedule–during birthing season?
And keep repeating…It’s not about brucellosis. It’s never been about brucellosis. Patently and ethically wrong, yes.
November 21, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Op-ed piece, 11/21/08 West Yellowstone News:
Bison advocates should remain cautious of the news that Interagency Bison Management Plan (IBMP) officials may allow some buffalo to temporarily access Horse Butte. While it sounds a tad encouraging, like the Royal Teton Ranch land lease, the devil is in the details. Under the draft western boundary document, all bison will still be forcefully removed from Horse Butte and any other lands outside of Yellowstone National Park by May 15, while lethal methods are still at the top of the agenda for the livestock industry-driven plan.
Continued http://westyellowstonenews.com:80/articles/2008/11/21/opinions/opinion1.txt