2009 Legislative Session: Week 11 (Part I)
by jhwygirl
This post covers Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. There’s a lot – I don’t know how many.
It’s real important, folks, to get your public comment in. Bills have – in most cases – moved from one house to the other. Either getting them out of committee and onto the floor or killing them is what is at stake here. For example – on Tuesday Rep. Krayton Kerns has his HB228, which is the gun bill which would eliminate a need for concealed weapons permits. It’s one of the most insane parts of this bill (which has been amended significantly since submittal) – it would only be a crime to carry a concealed weapon if you’ve used said concealed weapon to commit a crime. Get that? It would be legal to carry a concealed weapon up to the point where you commit a criminal offense. Some of the groups that have opposed this bill includes numerous law enforcement agencies, advocates for victims of sexual and domestic violence, and the Montana County Attorney’s Association.
So – as my example of why comment is important – this bill passed a floor vote in the evenly split house 60-40. It’s now in Senate Judiciary where it is possible that some sanity will make a showing. In the House, where members are elected every two years, many of those votes might be considered reactionary. Pam Schindler is the secretary – pschindler@mt.gov. Make sure to mention the bill number and request that your comments be forwarded to committee members.
Getting down to business…
There are no committee hearings scheduled for Monday in the House? At least that is what the legislative website is telling me. Weird. Guess that means that there will be a whole bunch of executive action (votes) on past hearings: committee meetings for Monday include Appropriations, Business & Labor, Education, Federal Relations, Energy, and Telecommunications, Human Services, Judiciary, Natural Resources, State Administration, Transportation, and Taxation.
In Senate Public Health, Welfare & Safety are three good bills: Rep. Cary Smith has two – HB263 which would ensure a patient’s right to know costs of medical procedures and HB264 which would ensure a patient’s right to know insurer coverage provisions for medical procedures.
Rep. Margaret Macdonald has HB214 would allow for Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women and bring income limits into line with federal standards. The fiscal note is out on this, and there should be no reason to see this one falter. Joan Linkenbach is the secretary for Senate Public Health, Welfare & Safety – jlinkenbach@mt.gov.
A good environmental bill: In Senate Natural Resources is Rep. Dan Villa with HB593, which would provide requirements and timelines for mine and smelter waste remediation projects. This one came out of the House with bipartisan support – 75-25, so let’s keep it moving. Lindsey Hern the secretary – lhern@mt.gov
Hard-working Missoula Rep. Michele Reinhart has HB522 in Senate Local Government ensures that parcels created via foreclosure or other court actions meet local zoning regulations. This one, too, had bipartisan support in the House. Libby Goodwin the secretary, lgoodwin@mt.gov
Now to Tuesday, we’ve got Sen. Gary Perry has SB437 which would prohibit the licensure of ponds using exempt ground water appropriations. Obviously, I love this one…exemptions to ground water appropriations are horrible. Until we can clear that up – and it will happen, I promise – laws like this are good. This had nice bipartisan support in the Senate – let’s keep this moving, too. In House Fish, Wildlife & Parks – Bryce Bennett the secretary – bbennett@mt.gov.
Sen. Bob Story is seeking a joint resolution urging Montana’s congressional representation to introduce legislation that would legalize industrial hemp. Hemp is a great product that can be used for everything from rope and cloth to food and industrial oils to biomass for fuel. In House Agriculture – Marshall McEwen the secretary – mmcewen@mt.gov.
On to Wednesday, another good one from Sen. Gary Perry is SB174 which would establish requirements for advanced pharmacist practitioners. This is a bill that is being done in anticipation of impending changes to Medicare and Medicaid. This is in House Business and Labor, Santella Baglivo the secretary, sbaglivo@mt.gov.
In House Taxation, Missoula’s Rep. Dick Barrett is seeking changes to tax laws that would provide tax withholding for nonresident sales of Montana real estate. HB647 is a good one, folks. We’ve got enough tax cheats from out of state – this law would help capture some of those lost tax revenues. Jennifer O’Loughlin the secretary – joloughlin@mt.gov
Rep. Gary MacLaren wants to tighten up laws regarding off-road vehicles and their unlawful usage over public lands closed to off-road usage. HB614, you can bet, will have plenty of advocates up there crying about how public lands should be open to their uncontrolled resource damage. Send some love to this one folks. In House Transportation – Katie Butcher the secretary – kbutcher@mt.gov.
Butte Democrat Sen. Jim Keane has a hearing for SB417, which would prohibit challenges to agencies based on violations of MEPA. Does this guy realize he’s a Democrat? That the state party platform spells out a commitment to our environmental laws? That MEPA is the outcome of our constitutional guarantee to a clean and healthful environment? And he’s from Butte? Didn’t Butte suffer tremendously under corporate environmental pollution? Bad water? And that Berkley Pit isn’t done dishing out its garbage yet?
Further, this horrible, horrible bill made it out of the Senate with a 29-21 vote, meaning two Democrats voted for this thing. Ugh. This is in House Federal Relations, Energy, and Telecommunications, Bryce Bennett the secretary – bbennett@mt.gov.
Ugh. I’ve had enough. Make sure to check out the complete list of hearings for these three days.
Please remember – if writing an email to the secretary of a committee, use the bill number and specifically request that it be distributed to the members of the committee. Your email can be as short as “Please vote NO” and include your name and address.
Calling is easy too – you can call the Session Information Desk at 406-444-4800 to leave a message for as many as five legislators or one legislative committee per call. Your message will be delivered directly to the legislators. The TTY (Telephone Device for the Deaf) number is 406-444-4462.
March 15, 2009 at 11:10 pm
Great heads up, jhwygirl.
Those Democrats who voted for HB228 should be ashamed. Even Wulfgar!, a strong gun rights supporter from the get go, acknowledges that Kerns’ gun bills are basically wedge issues — put the Democrats on defense, make them look anti-gun. It’s all smoke and mirrors.
But ten of them took the bait. Time to grow a spine or explain why every Tom, Dick and Mary should be packing a concealed weapon without a permit.
As for Jim Keane’s anti-MEPA bill — when are Butte voters going to get rid of this guy — he’s an embarrassment, and an affront to all the decent lawmakers from there (then again, Judy Martz comes to mind).
March 16, 2009 at 9:46 am
bears with concealed sidearms….it’s bad enough they let us have wallets with credit cards.
March 16, 2009 at 11:59 am
Wonder what ramifications Kerns’ bill would have for law enforcement and their ability to effectively use Terry patdowns? Seems like a nightmare for MHP, etc…
March 16, 2009 at 12:30 pm
it’s a nightmare for everyone. just had a gun nut kill 11 people in alabama.
March 16, 2009 at 1:06 pm
I think the dems who voted for this were really flexing a cop-out. There’s a defensive statement to be made for not voting for this on the grounds that 1) it IS a wedge issue, and that 2) if you REALLY love guns, you don’t want extremist measures like this to provoke the pendulum going the other way. If it’s enshrined in the U.S. constitution, building nonsensical state statutes on top of it is overkill, and only justifies the arguments made by those who want to take away our guns.
But, as Mr. Talbot rightly points out, there is a spine issue here, and these defensive arguments would require one.
March 16, 2009 at 2:04 pm
“2) if you REALLY love guns, you don’t want extremist measures like this to provoke the pendulum going the other way”
That makes more sense than anything I’ve heard this session.
March 16, 2009 at 11:39 pm
Like water laws dealing with the groundwater exemption? Any ideas on who might support a bill I submitted to eliminate this exemption? See LC0902.
March 17, 2009 at 4:39 am
Can you give us a little more information here, Rob? I went to the legislature website and all it said was “revise environmental laws.” The bill also seems to still be in draft form. I did notice that the bill was submitted by Jesse Laslovich — you from “Andaconda?”
March 17, 2009 at 6:16 am
Rob – - I wish the legislative website gave a better idea what LC bills had in store – but you could email me at hotmail dot com – I’d love to hear about it.
Exemptions for any groundwater appropriation are an assault on property rights. Senior water rights.