Archive for April 4th, 2006

Mysterious "Guest Writer" over at New West – Missoula has posted a scathing attack on the new Starbucks appearing on Higgins St:

Contrary to the Missoulian editor’s opinion, the angst surrounding the opening of a downtown Starbucks is more than just a fashion statement amongst the "local intelligentsia." It is a very real threat to the local coffee shops AND the loyal customers who frequent them.

Threat to the customers that frequent the local shops? Are Starbucks employees going to be beating local passers-by with broom handles? Did I miss something?

The downtown Missoula coffee market is more than saturated. There is a place to buy an espresso drink on EVERY single block of the downtown business district. The impending arrival of City Brew (with its Orange Street, interstate-friendly drive-thru) and downtown Starbucks are further pressuring an already pressurized market, hence the predatory practices which bring up the strong revulsion of Starbucks.

Must…not…criticize…bad grammar…

Anyhoo. As much as I like, support, and frequent Missoula businesses almost exclusively over big chains, I still think competition is a good thing. 

Of course, there is competition and there is competition

But Starbucks doesn't seem to use its size to gain unfair competition. The new store isn't going to have ten times the floor size as the local cafes, nor are its prices going to lowball its competition. In fact, Starbucks is a good role model for chains. It treats its suppliers and employees fairly.

The only thing Starbucks has over its compeition is its name. Hardly a "predatory" advantage, especially among Missoulians.

There is not an open market for espresso downtown. Starbucks is not providing something which is uniquely Missoulian or uniquely Montanan, like the rest of the downtown businesses. It will not draw tourists from other areas to downtown. While each coffee retailer has its own loyal customers who would never darken the door of a Starbucks, that’s not the customer base they are worried about. Downtown Missoula greatly relies on the summer tourist dollar. Coffee is of great comfort to the traveler. Before, a downtown tourist would have been obligated to take a chance on a local coffeehouse. Now the siren song of the "consistent yet mediocre" mermaid will be beckoning on North Higgins.

These are not customers who have the time or inclination to experiment with some local flavor. These customers have one shot to buy coffee downtown before they leave. A national name and familiarity is NOT something the local retailer can compete with.

Wholly unsubstantiated. What kind of tourist comes to Missoula to swing in and swing out in a single day? Do you know how hard it is to get here from anywhere else? And Starbucks isn't "mediocre." The coffee is pretty darn tasty.

Again, this is speculation. Has "Guest Writer" seen the improvements made to Break cafe, the closest joint to the new Starbucks location? Break just rented the neighboring space and knocked down a wall. It's got a huge floorspace, is having bands, and did I see a sign for wireless Internet? I mean, the place is spectacular now. Can Starbucks compete with Break?

Starbucks has been opening more than one new store each day, every day, for the past 7 years. Their presence downtown is not wanted or necessary. In the end, what I really want to know is: How many Starbucks stores is enough??

As Matt Singer commented in my last post on Starbucks,

It speaks well of Missoula’s economy that the biggest concern you have about the main drag is that national companies might be interested in jumping into Missoula’s downtown.

Or as Ed Kemmick said:

If I’m in a new town and I need a good latte, yep, I’ll go to Starbucks. But in Missoula? No way. Not with the Break, Butterfly Herbs, Liquid Planet and Bear’s Brew open for business. I’m guessing the only people who will drink at Starbucks are people who don’t normally go to downtown Missoula coffeeshops, which means more biz for the downtown. Sounds good to me.

To be fair to "Guest Writer," I haven't spoken anybody from Break or Liquid Planet about their feelings on the Starbucks. They're probably not terribly happy. (Come to think of it, Liquid Planet has a creepy chain-store feel about it, too.)

Still, as a dedicated consumer of the local cafe scene (I like Bernice's Bakery and the Break, in that order), I'm actuallly thrilled to have the Starbucks at the end of Higgins. That means shorter lines at the Break on market day.

Update: The author of New West's post was Rose Habib, the owner of the Raven Cafe.

The Raven is also a very cool cafe. I forgot to put it on my list.

Still, I don't see how Starbucks is going to be in direct competition with the Raven. The Raven seems to garner most of its business from its FABULOUS breakfast offerings — by far the best in town since the Old Town Cafe closed its doors, muchmuchmuch better than the Shack, which, for some reason, always wins the best breakfast category in the Indepent's "Best of Missoula…" survey — um, where was I?

Oh, yes. The Raven gets most of its business from breakfast, not from random coffee drinkers. Plus the Raven is situated much closer to Macy's/Bon Marche, the starting place for out-of-towners…

So I'm not worried. I could be wrong.

Media Matters catches, on tape, a conservative radio host calling African-American Rep. Cynthia McKinney a “ghetto slut.

“Secret presidential oversight board” not doing much oversight. Surprise!

Al Gore likens Bush to Neville Chamberlain for ignoring the threat of global warming. Poor Neville Chamberlain. I think he’s getting the raw end of the deal here.

FAIR praises four jounralists who got the WMD story right.

Delay to resign! A win for democracy!

The Houston Chronicle has a handy chronicle of the Delay scandal.

Of course, he blames Democrats. I wish these right-wingers would learn to accept responsibility for their actions. They always play the victim.

Republicans think that Delay’s resignation diminishes the corruption issue in the midterm elections. Um, except for the Abramoff thing. (Check out the rest of “Talking Points Memo” for more corruption news. It’s chock full today!)

The Daily Kos has an analysis of the legal issues surrounding Delay’s departure and the election he’s leaving.

Some freepers, while upset about Delay’s resignation, realize that he was far too liberal lately. So good riddance.

Double Speak offers some future employment opportunities.

Think Progress notices that Delay seems proud to have built the culture of corruption that now afflicts Washington. Um…this guy was Speaker of the House? Great job, GOP.

Let the theorizing begin! Christy Hardin Smith suspects feds used threats to prosecute Delay’s wife and daughter to leverage him into a deal. Note to aspiring Republicans: keep your family out of the business, if you know what I mean.

Digby, as always, nails it: Delay is the personification of the Republican party. Don’t give me any bull that the Democrats are just as bad, either. Georgia10 sees the whole story as a tragedy of politics.

  • Pages

  • Recent Comments

    Miles on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    success rate for In… on Thirty years ago ARCO killed A…
    Warrior for the Lord on The Dark Side of Colorado
    Linda Kelley-Miller on The Dark Side of Colorado
    Dan on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    Former Prosecutor Se… on Former Chief Deputy County Att…
    JediPeaceFrog on Montana AG Tim Fox and US Rep.…
  • Recent Posts

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,689,891 hits
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,734 other followers

  • April 2006
    S M T W T F S
  • Categories