Archive for June 7th, 2006

Kos finds in the Tester victory a new type of Democrat: the “libertarian Democrat.” The theory is that this new type of libertarian doesn’t see government as inherently evil and recognizes that individuals now face a great danger from corporate power:

The Libertarian Democrat understands that there is a third danger to personal liberty — the corporation. The Libertarian Dem understands that corporations, left unchecked, can be huge dangers to our personal liberties.Libertarian Dems are not hostile to government like traditional libertarians. But unlike the liberal Democrats of old times (now all but extinct), the Libertarian Dem doesn't believe government is the solution for everything. But it sure as heck is effective in checking the power of corporations.

In other words, government can protect our liberties from those who would infringe upon them — corporations and other individuals.

I’m somewhat with Kos as to the description of these “new” Dems. In fact, this is probably my biggest beef with the “free market” advocates lurking about the blogosphere, that they seem to fear government more than corporate power, when corporate power has pretty clearly taken over government. Win back government for the people and by the people in a populist race, then use that government to check corporate power.

That said, I think there are some services that government can provide other than a simple guarantor of individual liberties. Government would be useful in helping create single-payer health care system, which would be more efficient and cheaper and finally cover everybody – and which is a very popular idea amongst the majority of Americans.

I hate the name, though. “Libertarian.” Yuck. Reminds me of New Hampshire cranks hiding out in tarpaper shacks.

Kos also found a Newsweek article that mentions the Montana race, Howard Fineman’s “Outside the Beltway.”

For Democrats hoping to claw their way back to national power, this is the strategic paradox: to regain control of the political Establishment, they must forget about it.Democrats aren’t likely to find leaders and answers here in the capital, and can’t expect the traditional media to light the way. Instead, Democrats need to be a “states' rights” party in a new sense, shunning the sclerotic political machinery of the capital for the new ideas, programs and tactics sprouting in the states—and in the digital netroots of America.


But perhaps the netroots’ favorite avatar in waiting is Gov. Brian Schweitzer of Montana. In their eyes he’s the rootin’-tootin’ real deal, a rancher turned politician who believes in government activism set free from traditional liberal thinking and interest-group methods. This week a protégé of Schweitzer’s, a rancher named Jon Tester, won the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate. Kos happily noted that Tester comes from “the middle of nowhere”—Big Sandy, Mont.—and provided a link to a Yahoo map to prove it.

So that’s the place to start from in this new political era: not Washington, but the middle of nowhere.

I think that’s not far off. One of the reasons you can start a revolution in politics, like we’re doing here in Montana around the Tester campaign is that the forum’s small enough where people can actually have an effect on politics.

Tester’s rise is the spectacular result of local Democrats working hand-in-hand with activists, converted Republicans, and herefore disinterested citizens angered by DC’s callous disregard for peace, honesty, and the rule of law embodied in a slick-talkin’ Missouri politician. It’s a lot easier to spend the time, money, and energy politicking – even if you like the candidate and despise your opponent – when you know you, personally, as an individual can change things. Thus the movement centered around Tester.

So it’s natural that populist movement starts in a place like Montana and not in a place like California’s 50th House District. It’s easier. In California – the worlds 7th-largest economy – there’s too much money, too many people. The Dem challenger – Francine Busby – lost in large part because she ran a timid campaign aimed at wooing independent voters, the modus operandi of the mainstream Democratic party ever since Clinton.

Tester’s just proved that the issues matter less than competency and honesty. People may not agree with all of Tester’s stances – I don’t – but they trust him to do the right thing in the best interest of the state and country. We know he won’t sell us out for a small donation to his campaign funds.

Tester cultivated that image, not by hiding behind his principles, but by standing by them in clear terms. In other words, Tester won by being Tester. It’s really that simple, and Dems across the country should learn the lesson.

Meanwhile Courtney Lowery has analyzed the election returns and pinpoints likely battleground areas for the Tester-Burns duel: Bozeman, Billings and the rural counties. It’s an interesting examination of the state and well worth a read…

Let the battle between Conrad "Boss Hogg" Burns and Jon Tester begin.

Actually, from what I heard the battle against Tester started last night before the primary was decided. Rumor has it that Burns' people were on the phones with supporters urging them to go out and vote for Morrison.

Funny, don't you think? Maybe it's because 25% of the Republican voters crossed over party lines to vote for Tester? Some of the national pundits have Montana still "leaning Republican," but I can tell from last night's Tester win, Conrad Burns is in a heap of trouble:

–Burns is as crooked as the day is long. Abramoff. INSA. (Rumor also has it that it's going to affect other races, too, once the story really breaks. Let's just say that other GOP candidates should be very, very nervous.) Burns is one of the worst lawmakers in DC — or so says the Heritage Foundation, anyway.

–Tester is honest and competent. He loves his ranch farm. He's not gaining anything by moving to DC. This man is not going to a corporate shill like Boss Hogg Burns.

–East Coast elites are quite annoying all right, only Burns regularly sups at their feeding-troughs, while Tester is battling the DC insiders in his own party.

–Burns' campaign is moribund. Despite throwing millions into the primary race, attacking Democrats, he has actually lost ground against Tester.

This is going to be a fantastic summer. This campaign is going to be dirty. And I'm going to love it.

3-7-77. It's time to run the crooked carpetbagger out of down.


The post-election special! I linked to just about everything I could find on last night's election, but it appears as if newspapers and internet pundits are still in bed. Enjoy what I found.

Local coverage of the race…Great Falls Tribune: “[Tester] beat Morrison like a drum.” Gazette: “Tester Routs Morrison, will Challenge Burns.” Um, the others a little slow to respond?

Lindeen set to face Rehberg. This race needs to be hyped up a little…

Matt Singer exultant about the Tester win. Butterflies, indeed.

David Sirota believes Tester’s win is a win against D.C. for the rest of us.

Matt Stoller mulls the Tester win as part of a larger picture revealed by yesterday’s primaries.

Kos weighs in on CA HD 50, noting that Busby did it the wrong way, by trying to appeal to “independents.” I.e., the usual, timid way DC Dems would have us do it.

Firedoglake on the primaries.

CQ Politics on the Tester win: “Burns…likely will face a tough general election challenge from state Senate President Jon Tester…” They still rate the race, “leans Republican.”

Midterm Madness on Tester’s victory and the greater meaning of yesterday’s primaries.

Jon Stewart hammers Bill Bennett over gay marriage. Discussion over. Literally. The Senate killed the amendment.

  • Pages

  • Recent Comments

    Miles on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    success rate for In… on Thirty years ago ARCO killed A…
    Warrior for the Lord on The Dark Side of Colorado
    Linda Kelley-Miller on The Dark Side of Colorado
    Dan on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    Former Prosecutor Se… on Former Chief Deputy County Att…
    JediPeaceFrog on Montana AG Tim Fox and US Rep.…
  • Recent Posts

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,690,149 hits
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,734 other followers

  • June 2006
    S M T W T F S
  • Categories