Obama’s ‘Universal’ Insurance Mandate Exempts Hardships, Creates Doughnut Hole for the “Quite Poor”
August 21, 2009 in Barack Obama, Healthcare, Progressives
by JC
Yesterday, at Obama’s Organizing For America town hall, he let slip a valuable piece of policy information. In what to-date has been mostly a specifics-free push for reform that meets whatever set of goals that satisfy this week’s polling needs, Obama let loose in an hour and almost 20 minute video town hall that was streamed over the internet and had almost a quarter million call-ins on the conference.
Of course, he almost made it to the end without sticking his neck out. Then, in response to a gentleman’s question about what reform would mean for his son, who would soon be leaving the family insurance plan, we got this as an addendum to his answer:
[starting about 1:14:00 of the video] “…And then there are going to be hardship exemptions, there are going to be some folks who fall in a different category. They may be a little bit older, quite poor, but even with the subsidies they just can’t afford health care insurance and we’ll have to give them some hardship exemptions. And to folks like that we say to you, ok, if you can’t make the payments for, say 10% of your income, if you are in such a strapped situation, and you just can’t afford that, then, uh, you are exempt” …[closing message, then applause]
So I guess the Obama administration and Congress haven’t yet figured out that universal means universal and mandate means mandate. Of course there has to be some sort of doughnut hole. Medicare reform taught us that.
Hardship exemption. Huh. I guess that’s the new euphemism for being uninsured in the age of Obama. A badge of (dis)honor. And to be applauded by an audience full of so-called progressives. Progressive sheep. Maybe that applause was really baa, baa, baa-ing.
Watch the video, then contact your congressional rep to see if you fall in the new doughnut hole exemption. I know I will.
.Election Resources
- Denise Juneau for U.S. Senate
- Fact Check.org
- FEC Campaign Finance Reporting
- Follow the Money
- Montana PBS
- Montana Public Radio News Blog
- MT Campaign Reporting
- MT Goverment e-Calendar
- MT Legislature
- Open Congress
- Open Secrets
- PolitiFact
- Project Vote Smart
- Sunlight Campaign Ad Monitor
- Sunlight Foundation
Citizen's Info
- #OccupyMIssoula
- #occupyportland
- #occupyseattle
- #OccupyTogether
- #occupywallstreet
- A New Century of Forest Planning
- ACLU of Montana blog
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies
- Association of Alternative Newsweeklies
- Banktracker
- BLM Land Survey Information
- Buffalo's Fire
- Center for Budget & Policy Priorities
- Clark Fork Watershed Education Program
- Concerned Citizens Montana
- Cops and Courts
- CRMW's Regional Economies Assessment Database
- Dirty Oil Sands
- Donate to the Missoula Food Bank
- Donate to the Poverello Center
- EarmarkWatch.org
- FedSpending.org
- Good Jobs First
- Government News for Montana
- Guide to Montana Courts
- Hatewatch
- Headwaters Economics
- Headwaters News
- Health Reform Watch
- http://ncfp.wordpress.com/
- Immigration Blog
- John Adams' The Lowdown
- Kaiser Health News
- Keep It Rural Southwestern Montana
- MapLight.org
- MCAT Civic Channel 11 Schedule
- Media Matters
- Missoula City Council
- Missoula City/County Board Agendas and Minutes
- Missoula Consolidated Planning Board agendas and packets
- Missoula County Commissioners Weekly Agenda
- Missoula Independent
- Missoula Institute for Sustainable Transportation
- Missoula Neighborhoods
- Missoula OPG Calendar
- Missoula Public Library
- Missoula Red Tape
- MissoulaGov Listserv
- Missoulian
- Montana Budget and Policy Center
- Montana Capitol Report
- Montana Conservation Voters
- Montana Environmental Information Center
- Montana Food Bank Network
- Montana FWP Public Notices
- Montana Human Rights Network
- Montana Independent Living Action Alert
- Montana Innocence Project
- Montana Law Library blog
- Montana Medical Growers Association
- Montana Public Radio
- Montana Water
- MT Land Board
- MT Legislative Audit Reports
- MT Legislative Committee & Hearing Information
- MT Legislative Fiscal Division
- MT Legislative Fiscal Division
- MT Legislative Webpage
- New Progressive Alliance
- Northern Plains Resource Council
- Northern Rockies Independent Media
- Northern Rockies Independent Media Network
- Nortwest Digital Archives
- Project on Government Oversight
- Public Land/Water Access Association, Inc.
- Robert Reich
- Scholar as Citizen
- SCOTUS blog
- Senatus
- Smirking Chimp
- Sustainable Business Council
- Taxpayers for Common Sense
- The Burton K. Wheeler Center
- The Center for Public Integrity
- The Clark Fork Chronicle
- The Nation Institute
- The New Health Dialogue Blog
- The Policy Institute
- The Project for Excellence in Journalism
- The Tax Foundation
- Zeitlangers
Mountain Blogs
- .The.Banks.Account
- 2nd Grade Bike Rack
- 43rd State Blues
- A Secular Franciscan Life
- Alisia Duganz – MetaData
- aloneinaforest presents
- Beaverhead County Democratic Party
- Big Hole Trout
- Big Hole Watershed Committee grayling report
- Big Sky Blog
- Big Sky Democrat
- Bill LaCroix
- Billings Blog
- Billings Housing Market
- Bitterroot Badger's Bozeman Buddhist Blog
- Blue Oregon
- Bunk in the West
- Button Valley Bugle
- Buzztail
- Charley Carp's
- Clean Green Sustainable
- Cognitive Dissonance
- CosmicGarden
- D. Gregory Smith: From Here to Eternity
- Dark Acres
- Demarcated Landscapes
- dig this chick
- Discovering Urbanism
- DownWithTyranny!
- Duganz: A Heretic's life
- EcoRover
- Electric City Weblog
- F-Words
- Feral Cats of Freedom
- Flathead Memo
- Geo Fizz
- GeoPostings
- goddamnindependents
- GreaterFalls
- Hamm On Wry
- High Country News
- Hummingbirdminds
- Intelligent Discontent
- interested party
- Just Thoughts
- Karbon Kounty Moos
- Left in the West
- Livingston, I Presume
- Missoula Editor
- Missoulapolis
- Montana Legal Eagle's Blog
- Montana Main St.
- Montana Matters
- Montana Wildlife Gardener
- montanafesto
- Mountains, Plains & People
- mtpolitics.net
- Mudflats
- Naked but For a Loincloth
- Native American Netroots
- New West
- Night Vision Missoula
- Nils Ribi’s Blog
- Ninetynineweeks
- Northern Rockies Rising Tide
- Other Nations
- Out There with Tom
- Patia Stephens
- Piece Of Mind
- Political Game
- Pragmatic Revolt
- Prairie Mary
- Prairie Pedagogue
- Preserving the Beartooth Front
- Problembear
- Progressive Alaska
- Ragged Edge of the Universe
- Really?
- Reptile Dysfunction
- Savage Mama
- Shakespeare and Co.
- Speedkill
- Sporky
- Swanview Coalition
- The Buffalo Post
- The Hip Homemaker
- The Montana Cowgirl
- the Montana Maven
- The Odd Neighbor
- The Road Less Traveled
- The Western Word
- The Wildlife News
- This Montana Life
- thoughtstreaming
- Watermark
- West Fork Blues
- Western Democrat
- Wheaterville
- Wild Horse (and Burro) Warriors
- Wilder Than a Grizzly's Dream
- Wulfgar!'s
Political Blogs
Various & Sundry
- Big Sky Documentary Film Festival
- Counterpunch
- Good Food Store
- High Plains Films
- Honor the Fallen
- Jim Hightower
- Library of Congress Blog
- Margaret & Helen’s Blog
- Missoula Community Food Co-op
- Missoula Urban Demonstration Project
- Montana Office of Tourism
- Mother Jones
- North Missoula Community Development Corporation
- Orion Magazine
- Slog
- The American Prospect
- The Atlantic
- The Awl
- The Economist
- The Hill
- The Nation
- Wild West Institute
- Wildlife Film Festival
Meta
Archives
- October 2015
- September 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
Pages
Recent Comments
Miles on A New Shelter for Vets or an E… success rate for In… on Thirty years ago ARCO killed A… Warrior for the Lord on The Dark Side of Colorado Linda Kelley-Miller on The Dark Side of Colorado Dan on A New Shelter for Vets or an E… Former Prosecutor Se… on Former Chief Deputy County Att… JediPeaceFrog on Montana AG Tim Fox and US Rep.… -
Recent Posts
Blog Stats
- 1,673,273 hits
Categories
August 21, 2009 at 4:42 pm
I’m not really understanding your outrage. Do you really think someone who “even with the subsidies … just can’t afford health care insurance” should be financially penalized by the government for not buying it?
August 21, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Universal means covering all people. Mandate means all people must get coverage.
There will be a class of people who want coverage, yet will not be able to get it. And they are people who need it.
So we will have narrowed down the pool of uninsured to illegal immigrants and the not-quite-poor-enough yet not-quite-rich-enough to get insurance.
I just happen to think that’s a crock. Particularly when I most likely will fall in that category, and will continue to be unable to get insurance until I hit Medicare.
Call it self-interested outrage, if that will help, Jim.
August 21, 2009 at 7:46 pm
I know what universal means, and I know what mandate means. The way the mandate is enforced, is by imposing a penalty on those who do not comply. Do you know what it means to be exempt from a penalty?
You are advocating that you should NOT be exempt from the penalty… and calling that self-interest?
wtf?
August 21, 2009 at 9:02 pm
I think what he’s saying is that any health care reform has to insure everyone. By not insuring even just a small group, thats FU. That small group that can’t get insurance is a group that needs it the most.
That is the point of reform, no?
I mean – it’s nice and all that they aren’t going to penalize that group of people, but really, wtf (as you put it)?
August 21, 2009 at 9:29 pm
It’s been obvious for months that we are not going to have health care reform that provides health care for everyone. This post makes it sound like that is some new information that Obama ‘let slip’. It’s not.
August 21, 2009 at 11:16 pm
Obama aside, Jim – I never took you to be the nonchalant type.
I will continue writing or phoning until the vote is cast.
August 22, 2009 at 8:17 am
It’s not nonchalance, it’s cynicism.
August 22, 2009 at 2:58 pm
Cynicism is no reason to quit critiquing the legislative process, and policy goals of the admin.
I used to be a die-hard cynic. Got tired of my family and friends treating me like an old curmudgeon. So I did something about it.
August 22, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Cynicism is not a reason to quit, but realism is a reason to pick your battles.
For instance jhwygirl saying “I will continue writing or phoning until the vote is cast.” Writing or phoning who? Max Baucus? Denny Rehberg? They certainly don’t care how many times you call them.
August 22, 2009 at 8:48 pm
have you guys read Matt Taibbi’s screed against our “legislative” process as it pertains to health care reform? i like his indignant style, and the article is very informative about how fucked our “process” has become.
if the bill comes out as bad as it’s looking, the progressive dems should actually try to assert themselves and pull their support. maybe that would wipe the smirk from Pelosi’s craven face.
August 22, 2009 at 12:34 am
Obvious? It was obvious to you that Obama was going to exclude this specific group of people who need access to health care the most?
You think that is a good progressive goal? Do you know how many people are stuck in Medicaid because they cannot afford (because of medical expenses) to make more than the Medicaid cutoff? That their next job up doesn’t provide health care, or pay enough to cover an individual health care plan?
Obama’s doughnut hole will continue the choice that people have to make between keeping their healthcare (Medicaid) or taking a marginally better job with no health benefits.
I happen to think Obama’s revelation of that fact yesterday, in the absence of any other health insurance reform details was quite striking.
And the fact that progressives in attendance applauded him showed what sheep many of them have become.
August 22, 2009 at 8:06 am
“It was obvious to you that Obama was going to exclude this specific group of people who need access to health care the most?”
Yes.
“You think that is a good progressive goal?”
No.
“I happen to think Obama’s revelation of that fact yesterday, in the absence of any other health insurance reform details was quite striking.”
Except, despite your histrionics, there was no such revelation, Obama has said clearly all along that the only to cover everyone is with single payer, and that that is not going to happen.
August 22, 2009 at 12:01 pm
of course we need to plug this hole. it’s ridiculous. goes against any decent person’s sensibility. it erodes a person’s incentive to better one self economically. essentially imprisoning the person who’s survival depends on the medical care.
i can be cynical too but i have my limits. sometimes you need to get up on your hind legs and demand some common sense from that worm farm in washington that thinks up this stuff. fire the idiot on obama’s staff who actually proposed this. that would be a start. and then, back to the drawing board, mr president.
August 22, 2009 at 8:06 pm
We haven’t known for months or for weeks what the health care industrial complex will allow us to have.
All we know is that they say they will allow us to have something, maybe. if we bribe them well enough.
August 22, 2009 at 8:20 pm
it’s a giant poker game and we are the chips.
August 22, 2009 at 12:48 pm
here’s a great post with some inspiring footage- bookmark this blog!
http://codycodester.blogspot.com/2009/08/lou-dobbs-tours-single-payer-systems.html
common sense! i love it.
August 23, 2009 at 10:47 pm
“. . . . it’s a giant poker game and we are the chips.”
Perhaps that is why so many people on on all sides of the political spectrum are concerned and speaking out…..they don’t like the game or the way it is being played.
August 23, 2009 at 10:52 pm
Agreed pogo.