Religious freedom my a**
by Pete Talbot
Abortion, birth control, women’s health care and religious freedom have all been in the news lately, often in the same story.
As a man, I’m not even sure I get to comment on this but since knotheaded dudes write letters to the editor all the time decrying a woman’s right to choose and a couple of Montana Catholic Bishops, neither whom are women, have made pronouncements, here goes.
Let’s start with Congressman Rehberg’s response to the Obama administration’s rule that birth control should be provided in insurance plans for Catholic schools and hospitals:
“This order is government intrusion into the private lives of Americans under the guise of health care reform and infringes on the religious liberty of women and men of faith in direct opposition to the religious freedom enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution,” says Rehberg.
So, some non-Catholic woman working in St. Patrick Hospital’s cafeteria will not have access to affordable birth control because of some archaic religious belief. Talk about infringing on the “religious liberty of women” as “enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution,” right Denny?
To the uber-Catholic women who happen to work at St. Pats and are opposed to birth control: just don’t use it (you can always use the rhythm method. That works, sometimes).
Closer to home, the Ravalli County Commissioners, by a 3-2 vote, are accepting Title X family planning funding. This would seem like a no-brainer — around $40K for birth control, annual exams, pregnancy and pap tests, testing for sexually transmitted diseases, nutrition education and counseling, on a sliding scale.
But of course these commissioners have issues that deal with a lack of parental notification for minors. They’re willing to sacrifice low-cost women’s health programs for their narrow ideology.
Granted, I’d want my kids to talk to me about their sexual concerns. I’d rather they have access to an STD or pregnancy test, birth control, or sexual education and counseling, if they choose not to confide in me .
Again, I’m always amazed by the less-government intrusion crowd dictating their moral imperatives to the rest of us, via government programs. The overused but accurate “hypocrite” comes to mind.
All this news comes on the heels of the Susan G. Komen controversy. If you believe that attacks by the right on women’s health care issues aren’t still in play, often under the misnomer of “religious freedom,” you’d be wrong.