The Missoula Independent Censors Ochenski on the Subject of the Importance of a Free Press

by jhwygirl

Northern Broadcasting Network’s Aaron Flint of the Flint Report broke the news late yesterday afternoon regarding that the not-so-free-thinking Missoula Independent’s permanent severance of its relationship with long time political columnist George Ochenski was essentially the result of editor Robert Meyerowitz’s decision to not accept Ochenski’s planned column on the Indy’s 21st birthday and the importance of a free press in Montana.

So we have a political opinion columnist wanting to discuss the importance of the free press in Montana being censored by the editor of a newspaper that prominently features the byline of “Free Thinking” under its name “Missoula Independent”?

Now we know that’s another one of the quirky little whimsical things the Indy does. “Free Thinking”

Ha. Funny funny. Hilarious.

Goddess knows – and others – that I am a firm believer in the free press and that lovely thing we call The First Amendment.

So much so – and ya’all know I love them – that even some of my fellow bloggers on this page have expressed their disappointment in my lack of any interest in censoring anonymous commenters that sometimes all-too-frequently grace the pages here at 4&20blackbirds.

It’s perplexing, to say the least, that a newspaper would censor an award-winning political opinion columnist on a column regarding the First Amendment – especially when you consider that the Indy’s President, Matt Gibson spoke quite eloquently and passionately on these very pages about his firm believe in the unequivocal protections of the First Amendment:

I understand the profound concern people have about the pernicious influence of money on politics and policy, but an assault on our first amendment rights to assembly and speech will destroy more than it protects. Without free speech guarantees for corporations, virtually every newspaper will lose constitutional protection for its news reporting and editorial writing. The majority in the Supreme Court decision explicitly warned that the government has no reliable method to discern earnest editorial commentary from corporate advocacy. I don’t want to live in a country or operate any kind of news reporting outfit where every newspaper column or broadcast commentary is potentially actionable because it violates corporate restrictions on political activity.

Trying to silence groups of people who might disagree with you seems fundamentally wrong to me anyway.

On the other hand, I’m strongly in favor of stringent requirements to quickly and reliably report the identities of individuals and corporations engaged in political speech. The people behind public policy campaigns should be easily identifiable and held accountable in the court of public opinion for their openly professed views.

Matt Gibson
Independent Publishing, Inc.

I will proudly add that I was the sole person who rated that comment 4 stars. Which will – again – probably get me in a little trouble.

Gibson has a few other comments on JC’s post regarding Missoula city council’s resolution to amend the constitution to eliminate corporate personhood – all on the subject of free speech.

His comments being somewhat ironic considering he takes the time to correct me – rightfully so – on this post by showing his knowledge on the history of bribery in Montana elections.

And so aside from what I have heard over the years from the many reporters that have graced the Indy is Gibson’s (perhaps slight) intolerance for this anonymous blogger right here…Gibson, it seems supports free speech.

Or did.

Without an explanation from the Indy – either editor Robert Meyerowitz or president Matt Gibson (or publisher Lynne Foland) what are readers left to think?

Especially when Montanans – statewide – now have to read that Ochenski was silenced because he wanted to write about the value of the free press. In Montana.

If the Indy thinks they are right, that is one thing – but I again reiterate in what I believe are the interests of a newspaper that I have come to deeply respect over the years: The Missoula Independent has an obligation to its readers to address the departure of its twelve year award winning political commentary columnist George Ochenski.

Right now, they seemed determined to ignore the issue. While virtually all calls to the Indy offices (406-543-6609) went to voice mail today – this mainly due to the fact that the Indy doesn’t have a receptionist – no one that I knew who called got a return phone call. And I certainly hope some of those calls were advertisers like The Good Food Store, Rockin’ Rudy’s, Ten Spoon Winery and Butterfly Herbs calling to hold the Indy to some certain amount of accountability.

Alexis Bonogofsky, a conservation program manager for the National Wildlife Federation and a goat rancher on the Yellowstone who continues to suffer the ill-effects of the Exxon spill on the Yellowstone wrote to the Indy asking about the departure of Ochenski and his column:

Mr. Meyerowitz and Mr. Gibson,

It recently came to my attention that George Ochenski is no longer with the Independent. His column is extremely important, relevant and necessary to all of us in Montana that follow politics.

I am waiting for the Independent to come out and explain why his column has been terminated. I think a man who has produced quality journalism and analysis of Montana state politics for your paper for over a decade deserves as much.


Alexis Bonogofsky

Gibson wrote back:

Thanks for your note, Alexis. I hope you will find the Indy continuing to publish extremely important, relevant and necessary content from all of our contributors in the future.

Alexis – who should be a reporter for her persistence for an answer – responded:

Thanks for the response but I’m more interested in what happened to his column? Are you no longer going to publish it or address it at all?

Gibson ended the exchange with:

George won’t be writing for the Indy anymore, but that doesn’t mean we won’t have strong content in the future. Beyond that, I think it’s between us and George.

Gibson’s last exchange came just a few minutes before Aaron Flint reports on their censorship of his weekly political column. Perhaps now they may feel a need to state what has transpired.

The reality is that the truth is out there. Gibson knows this as does Meyerowitz. They are newspaper veterans, and to put their heads in the sand on an issue near and dear to a community (maybe I should say “market”) of Missoulians when there are alternative sources for both news and advertisement is, it seems, pretty risky.

Failure to address Ochenski’s departure will hang over the Indy. It will cloud their respectability as a “Free Thinking” newspaper – and it unfairly disrespects a departure that would be better left with the Indy taking a high road and giving its deserving loyal readers (and a columnist who helped in a very big way make the Indy what it is today) the truthful explanation and closure all parties deserve.

  1. evdebs

    Too bad Meyerowitz has moved to crush progressive opinon.

    I’m not surprised. I lived in Alaska for many years and watched the Anchorage Press slide under his dubious leadership.

    One of his best writers, though, Amanda Coyne, went to the Alaska Dispatch and helped make it the most important web publication in the state. They were in no small part responsible for the demise of the candidacy of Joe Miller, who might have been the worst near-miss (he beat a Republican incumbent in the primary) in the US Senate since Wiliam A. Walker bribed his way to an almost-seat in that body. Miller, by the way, wanted like many Tea Partiers, to repeal the 17th Amendment, which Walker’s own inquitiy was originally responsible for its passage.

    I have a worse example. Charles Overby, father of the Freedom Foundation and the Newseum in D.C., is on the board of the Corrections Corporation of America, along with Thurgood Marshall, Jr., trading on his dad’s name. For about $180,000 per year, they have supported the spending of millions to keep CCA free from having to disclose how taxpayers’ money is being misspent on its millionaire corporate executives while jeopardizing public safety and the lives of its own employees.

  2. Steve W

    jhwygirl, great piece you have up this AM. Thanks for keeping us informed about what’s happening.

    I think you are right; “Failure to address Ochenski’s departure will hang over the Indy.”

    i think it already has.

    My guess is that somebody didn’t like George’s opinion about a free press and how that relates to the 21st anniversary of the Indy. My guess is if someone addresses that opinion it will make them look bad as well as being the same as publishing George’s piece in the first place. So they are trying to keep it shut up and hope people’s memories are short and it goes away.

    Have you invited George to publish his column at 4&20?

    I’d love to read it.

  3. Matthew Koehler

    Solid post J-girl.

    The Indy’s Facebook page is available for commenting on this situation.


  4. Has the Independent learned nothing from the UM debacle? I will miss the Independent. If they are going to fire Oschenski, then they aren’t the free press paper I’ve been reading since Issue 1.

  5. If you stand with Ochenski and want answers to why he was axed from the Indy, post a photo and tell us why you value Ochenski’s voice here:

  6. yswolf

    Of course, the Indy stands to make tons of money this election season with Ochenski out of the way, Nobody left to interrupt the flow of Carl Rove and friends now.

  7. George Ochenski is scheduled to appear on Northern Broadcasting’s “Voices of Montana” statewide radio talk show w/ conservative host Aaron Flint between 9 and 10 am Wednesday. Call the studio line, 866-627-5483, or send an email to and ask #wheresochenski? Listen live on 930 AM in Missoula or live on-line via:

  1. 1 A “Celebration” to Forget — Forecast for the Indy’s Coming of Age: Cloudy and Murky « 4&20 blackbirds

    […] I have resided in the Missoula area. Yet how can the Indy celebrate — particularly just after canning its premier writer, George Ochenski? Or maybe the Indy is celebrating the purging of its most prolific free-thinking […]

  2. 2 The Question Continues: Where’s George Ochenski? « 4&20 blackbirds

    […] only is it not good for the readers, it’s can’t be good for the newsroom. As I stated on Friday: “Failure to address Ochenski’s departure will hang over the Indy. It will cloud their […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Pages

  • Recent Comments

    Miles on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    success rate for In… on Thirty years ago ARCO killed A…
    Warrior for the Lord on The Dark Side of Colorado
    Linda Kelley-Miller on The Dark Side of Colorado
    Dan on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    Former Prosecutor Se… on Former Chief Deputy County Att…
    JediPeaceFrog on Montana AG Tim Fox and US Rep.…
  • Recent Posts

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,689,848 hits
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,734 other followers

  • June 2012
    S M T W T F S
  • Categories

%d bloggers like this: