Missoulian’s Editorial Triumvirate Wants Obama To Approve The Pipeline

by lizard

The Editorial Board of the Missoulian—Publisher Jim McGowan, Editor Sherry Devlin, and Opinion Editor Tyler Christensen—want Obama to approve the Keystone XL pipeline.

Though I have little doubt Obama’s state department will eventually do just that, it’s worth examining why our local editorial board decided to shill away their paper’s editorial voice supporting this disastrous project:

Eventually, President Barack Obama is going to have to make some sort of decision about the Keystone XL pipeline project. So far he’s managed to put off signing the presidential permit needed to move the project forward – and it looks like he has a little more time still.

But within the next couple of months, the U.S. State Department will complete its review of the environmental impact statement, and all signs point to an official recommendation to approve the pipeline. Obama should be ready to add his support for this important addition to the nation’s energy infrastructure.

First, I may need some help understanding something. How can a pipeline built by a foreign corporation for the ultimate goal of enriching its shareholders be construed as adding to America’s national energy infrastructure? Am I missing something?

Selling this mess to Americans hinges on carefully managing the cost/benefit perceptions of a public mostly removed from the negative impacts of building and maintaining an oil pipeline.

Before the obvious cheerleading about jobs, Baucus and “widespread” support is highlighted. Then, as weakly as possible, the “vocal opposition” is described:

Last Friday, the U.S. Senate made its position clear with a 62-37 vote in favor of the project. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., co-authored the nonbinding budget amendment in an attempt to send a strong message about the proposed pipeline’s significance. The Senate vote reflects widespread support for the project, including in Montana, notwithstanding a good deal of vocal opposition from opponents, including in Montana.

Some famous names have joined the movement to convince Obama to reject the permit application. Many environmentalists are concerned about potential oil spills. Some of them argue that the pipeline would result in increased greenhouse gas emissions. And, of course, in his recent State of the Union address, Obama all but ordered Congress to slow climate change by addressing greenhouse gas emissions.

After this meager effort, it becomes clear the writers of this editorial had to preserve their strength in order to heave out the following bit of salesmanship:

However, it’s a good bet that the majority of Montanans are in favor of the project. Certainly Montana’s entire congressional delegation is on board. They understand that the pipeline project will create thousands of new, good-paying jobs and prefer that the U.S. get its oil from its close neighbor and ally, Canada. They note that TransCanada has agreed to a strict set of conditions designed to avoid any environmental damage. Besides, the State Department has concluded that the project carries no significant risk of environmental harm – or of an increased rate of greenhouse gas emissions, given that development of Canada’s tar sands is expected to happen with or without the new pipeline.

The thousands of good paying new jobs, one of the biggest hyped benefits, are almost all temporary. A report in 2010 estimated that number was around 118,000 jobs. That number has since been cut in half, and the number of permanent jobs? According to a state department report: 35.

The State Department has just this week released a report which actually estimates a far lower number of jobs will be created by the Keystone XL pipeline. The one to two year construction phase of the pipeline will likely only create around 42,100 jobs, and this number would fall to just 35 permanent jobs in order to perform maintenance and inspections along the entire length.

A possible cost of a pipeline is the cost to humans, the environment, and the taxpayer pocketbook if a spill happens. Thank goodness there are “strict conditions” that TransCanada has agreed to. And the state department says “no significant risk of environmental harm”.

That certainly wasn’t what the Governor of Nebraska was saying back in August of 2011.

And then there’s that whole getting our oil fix from a friend instead of a foe. I have a different understanding of who friends and foes are, and for now I’ll just leave it at that, because there’s more editorial to consume.

But if it is approved, the Keystone XL pipeline extension would carry up to 830,000 barrels of crude oil per day from the Port of Morgan on the Montana-Canadian border, through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska to connect to an existing pipeline in Steel City, Neb., and eventually reach the Gulf Coast. This portion of the pipeline would cover nearly 900 miles and cost more than $3 billion.

TransCanada first forwarded the pipeline proposal in 2008; received Canadian approval just two years later. The U.S. portion of the project, meanwhile, is still under debate. Montana and South Dakota have both granted their approval; Nebraska recently signed on as well after TransCanada agreed to route the pipeline around environmentally sensitive areas.

On March 1, the State Department released its supplemental EIS. It is now conducting the 45-day public comment portion of this laborious and time-consuming process. Once this chapter of the Keystone XL pipeline saga has ended, Obama should finally close the book on it. He should go ahead and sign the permit.

Remember folks, TransCanada is going to sell this shit anyway to someone, so Obama should just get it over with. And honestly, he really needs to stop stringing along the hopeless hopefuls hoping Obama won’t do what us cynics now expect him to do, like protect Monsanto.

I guess this is just the fucked up world we live in, a world where a shilling editorial board pimps itself for oil while asshole MT Republicans kill 12,000 jobs and destroy the opportunity to insure 70,000 uninsured Montanans.

Thank the almighty lord I’m getting the hell out of town next week. I need a little vacation.


  1. d.g.

    With Lee Enterprises still hemorrhaging money at Corporate, I think the last Missoulian writer with a social conscience took the contract buy-out about a year ago. I most strongly associate Editor Sherry Devlin’s discernment abilities with her effusive piece two years ago in which she proclaimed that she was leaving a “heart-shaped doormat” at the Missoula Merc building to celebrate its purchase by the out-of-state development group. Not exactly a controversial event, but her excitement (translate: need for advertisers to replace Macy’s) was pathetically palpable in print. Remember too, the last Missoulian publisher quit to work for First Interstate Bank. Thanks for your editorial but, where the Missoulian is concerned, having expectations only invites disappointment, frustration and environmental ennui.

  2. “fucked up world” we live in is just about all you can say anymore. As you say, the oil from Canada is just passing through on its way to the Gulf to be exported for the profits of some Canadian company creating a whopping 35 permanent jobs. And Republican state representatives can’t even do basic math in regards to providing health care for Montanans. Or they don’t want to. And Democrats got all high on Hopium and actually think the Affordable Care Act was really that big step towards a real national health care system. Ha. Ha. Ha. Now they are scrambling to understand why they are reduced to asking for scraps from the table as they watch their oligarchs dismantle the New Deal.
    Meanwhile, banksters are hoping to bring to a bank near you the Cyprus solution. If they don’t get bailed out by Bernanke, then they can just take a cut of your savings account to cover their bad debts.
    Yes indeed. It’s a “fucked up world”. I honestly have no solutions since one team is just mean and the other team is delusional.

  3. Hawk a Loogie!

    Lizard, it’s me. Please don’t ban me. I have it on good authority that that son-of-a-bitchin’ pipeline will NOT be approved! For you see, the final part of the permitting process is US! That has been a Ranger motto for a long time now. Are you with us or against us? Is that a threat? Well, no. We like to think of it as a PROMISE!

    p.s. And to the FBI, feel free to come around again, boys, any time you want to chat again. We’ve got nothing to hide like YOU dudes do!

    • Let me be crystal clear here Larry. Do not use 4&20 to toss thinly-veiled anonymous threats at the FBI.

      Your terrorist-style (combat boots, fatigues and open carry of high powered rifles in public meetings) environmentalism is also not the type of activism that does people who want to deal in policy any good. That’s because the underlying message you were (and still are) trying to convey was (and is) violence.

      • Big Swede

        Looks like Larry has gone full unabomber.

        Any links to his stupid stunt?

        • Jhwygirl

          That goes back a decade, if not more. His Environmental Rangers stuff.

    • lizard19

      I second that.

  4. Lynn

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/03/30/1197909/-This-week-in-the-world-of-progressive-state-blogs-Local-news-and-views-from-all-around

  5. lizard19

    thank you Lynn.

  6. The Polish Wolf

    This is a real question, because I don’t know that answer and y’all probably do: Is there any precedent for the State Department making decisions based on environmental, not diplomatic or geopolitical, grounds?

    • Craig Moore

      PW, their charge in this matter comes from Executive Order 13337. http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rls/95020.htm

  1. 1 Forget Pipeline Blues With Pipe Dream Wine | 4&20 blackbirds

    […] the Missoulian editorial board came out strongly for the Keystone pipeline, ExxonMobil experienced a little problem in Mayflower, Arkansas. This Alternet piece highlights the […]

  2. 2 “It’s going to get built” | 4&20 blackbirds

    […] you want to read more about why the Keystone Pipeline is such a terrible idea, I wrote this post back in March, after the Missoulian printed their very pro-pipeline […]

  3. 3 Montana at a Environmental Crossroads | 4&20 blackbirds

    […] alliance. It doesn’t help that we have media whores like the Missoulian editorial board shilling for a pipeline, blaring the jobs trumpet as one factor that makes this project necessary. In that post I linked to […]

  4. 4 Ryan Zinke and Jon Tester Agree: Build that Pipeline! | 4&20 blackbirds

    […] for Montanans and for the Earth’s climate. It doesn’t help that our local newspaper shills for this project and our former Governor enjoys eloquently blaming delays on “jackasses” in […]




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Pages

  • Recent Comments

    Jon Tester’s G… on Senator Tester Backs Wall Stre…
    Digging Deeper: Exam… on A visit from a Montana Na…
    Washing Ton on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    Manitou springs on The Dark Side of Colorado
    C. Willie on American Poets: Robinson …
    C. Willie on American Poets: Robinson …
    bretagnebk on The Dark Side of Colorado
  • Recent Posts

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,635,703 hits
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,732 other followers

  • March 2013
    S M T W T F S
    « Feb   Apr »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Categories


%d bloggers like this: