Archive for November 6th, 2013


I’m having a hard time letting this one go. After Liz’s recent post on the seeming opening up of the Missoulian’s editorial page to some forward-thinking words about beginning a community dialog on mental illness, now we have outright lies and opinion masquerading as fact to continue that discussion.

I guess a bone tossed to the left deserves a bone tossed to the right, eh? Such be “balance” on the Missoulian’s editorial page. So what’s got me so ruffled? Well State Sen. Fred Thomas from down the Bitterroot seems to have been parroting some rightwing blather about Medicaid.

I get all of the outrage against Obamacare. I’ve railed against it since it became clear that Max Baucus was going to give us one of his uniquely dysfunctional American “solutions” to the lack of access to health insurance that the poor, the lower middle class, and those with preexisting conditions have.

But I’ve always maintained that through all of the ideology and desire for a workable single payer system, that Obamacare could be considered a good thing when people actually got some insurance that could help them get access to health care. To the degree that it had a positive effect on people’s health and lives, it might a good thing. We could sort out all the ideology and politics and disinformation later. I guess it’s time to let the sorting-out begin.

So when the Missoulian opened the discussion about mental illness, of course, one of the topics has to be the impact of expanding Medicaid to impoverished and homeless populations. But when Sen. Thomas wrote up his opinion piece tirade justifying the Montana Legislature’s denial of Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion using a bunch of lies instead of facts, well, I guess the Missoulian isn’t too concerned about fact-checking it’s “dialog” about mental illness.

Sen. Thomas goes off in two main directions justifying his and the Legislature’s actions: 1) using a study of Oregon’s recent Medicaid expansion and 2) the budgetary impact on Montana State’s fiscal status. I’m not going to get into the debate over the scientific study, as that is well trodden territory (dkos and wonkblog have both taken it on, as have right wingers).

There’s much to debate about Medicaid and how it could be improved, but there is no debate about the difference between being poor and not having any health insurance or Medicaid, or having Medicaid. Any who would suggest that poor people are better off without having some form of access to health care via either Medicaid or private insurance are just pissin’ in the wind.

Suffice it to say that the study’s positive findings (i.e. decreased incidence and severity of depression in those who were newly enrolled in Medicaid for 2 years) have a great impact on the mental illness conversation. If the study would have looked at other forms of mental illness, I’m sure it would have found that a poor and/or homeless person who had mental illness that received Medicaid coverage would have better outcomes, and decreased incidence of symptoms.

Afterall, if you are bipolar or schizophrenic, and living under a bridge not only will you not get diagnosed, you wouldn’t be able to pay for your meds anyways, and get ongoing treatment (and no, Partnership Health in Missoula County does not offer any form of robust mental health services for free, nor does a short stint in the Providence Center’s Mental Health Unit provide comprehensive ongoing care for those without insurance or Medicaid).

Untreated mental illness is one of the largest contributors to both addiction and homelessness in our communities. To the degree that poor individuals with mental illness and/or addiction get meaningful access to either health insurance or Medicaid, they can get treatment that will begin to lessen their burden on our community and their families and they can start contributing to society.

But it’s the point that Sen. Thomas made about the Medicaid expansion’s funding under Obamacare that is such a blatant lie. Here’s what he had to say:

Potentially a far larger problem with the Obamacare Medicaid expansion was the hole it would blow in our balanced budget. Currently the revenue of the state of Montana is estimated to grow by $318.8 million from the current biennium to the next. So we expect to have $318.8 million more in 2014-15 than 2012-13. This is what provided the revenue to increase our local school K-12 funding, university system and health and human service programs.

The Obamacare Medicaid expansion is expected to cost $179.3 million in the biennium of 2018-19 and $281.7 million the next.

If we were to have expanded Medicaid, we would have committed up to 88 percent of the current revenue growth to this Medicaid expansion cost. That would have eliminated the funding increases we were able to provide for our local schools, university system and health and human services.”

What Sen. Thomas ignores is the FACT that when a state expands its Medicaid services to people under the poverty line (or 138% of poverty at the highest level), the federal government picks up the entire tab for 3 years, and during the period from 2014 – 2022 picks up a total of 93% of the cost. After 2022, the states will be responsible for only 10% of the cost of Medicaid.

So his argument against the State’s expansion of Medicaid largely rests on either an inability to understand the basic facts surrounding Medicaid expansion costs, or a desire to just use lies to justify his and the Legislature’s actions and ideological biases. Neither of which gives him the credibility necessary for the Missoulian to offer him a bunch of space to offer up a pack of lies.

It will be interesting to see how this “conversation” about mental illness and Medicaid plays out in the Missoulian, given that they have set up ground rules where opinion masquerades as fact, and the role of the media is to let a discussion as important as one about mental illness, poverty and homelessness be conducted in a fact-free environment.

by lizard

When Eric Schmidt arrived at Google, he thought the motto ‘Don’t Be Evil’ was “the stupidest rule ever“. That quote comes from an NPR interview Schmidt did with Peter Sagal. At the conclusion of the interview Sagal jokingly stated that NOT being evil will “never work in American business.”

I agree Peter. Also, not being evil will never work in American government, where continued disclosures about NSA spying expose a level of criminality only the most paranoid citizen speculated on before Edward Snowden began confirming that paranoia was justified last June.

The latest: The NSA’s Invasion of Google and Yahoo Servers.

What a week! Shortly after Secretary of State John Kerry admitted that maybe our government had gone “too far” in its surveillance programs, the Washington Post dropped another Edward Snowden bombshell demonstrating that it is going a whole lot farther than we knew.

If Kerry’s ersatz admission — couched in a defense of National Security Agency surveillance — provoked a collective yawn from many who follow these developments, the latest Snowden stuff snapped us to attention. The Post published an article detailing the NSA’s interception of information coming in and out of Google and Yahoo servers over non-public, internal network fibre optic lines. In December, 2012 alone, the program (revealingly called “MUSCULAR”) processed 181,280,466 Google and Yahoo records that included email, searches, videos and photos.

Up to now, the NSA has defended its actions by telling us it is combatting terrorism through the capture of data in a public space, the Internet, after obtaining court orders. This shows they were lying. MUSCULAR is the theft of about 25 percent of all Internet data from two of the most popular data handling companies with no court orders or advisories in complete defiance of the law and our rights. It is, quite simply, government gangsterism.

And it brings into focus the most important question: why? Because this isn’t about counter-terrorism, not with that many records and their surreptitious capture. This is about surveillance and analysis of the daily communications of an entire country and much of the world.

Maybe this invasion by the NSA is why Google is developing some secretive project that includes two huge barges parked off the west and east coast.

Speculation on what this project could be is rampant. Personally, I’m hoping Google is building a force field to protect America from nuclear fallout if the Fukushima rod-removal goes bad. Or maybe the west coast barge houses a giant laser that will vaporize the island of Fukushima debris the size of Texas heading for the west coast.

Hope springs eternal, right? Just don’t be evil, Google.

  • Pages

  • Recent Comments

    Miles on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    success rate for In… on Thirty years ago ARCO killed A…
    Warrior for the Lord on The Dark Side of Colorado
    Linda Kelley-Miller on The Dark Side of Colorado
    Dan on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    Former Prosecutor Se… on Former Chief Deputy County Att…
    JediPeaceFrog on Montana AG Tim Fox and US Rep.…
  • Recent Posts

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,687,836 hits
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,736 other followers

  • Categories