Your Week In Modern American Neoliberalism

by lizard

Some people, to feel better about themselves, will make fun of other people. This happens in politics as well. There is no better way to make yourself feel good about being a Democrat, for example, than focusing on how awful Republicans are.

At Intelligent Discontent last week, Don offered a post titled Your Week in Modern American Conservatism where he looks at what happens to the “hive-deluded mind at Fox News” when a progressive pundit—a black woman—makes an appearance to suggest that instead of telling women to arm and protect themselves from rapists, maybe, just maybe we should be telling men NOT TO RAPE. Not surprisingly the woman who dared to state this obvious point—Zerlina Maxwell—is now the target of malicious online attacks.

In the comments, I offered a solution that I thought a Democrat might be open to: kill all evil Republicans with drone strikes. When I asked if modern liberalism supports killing anyone, anywhere, at any time with drones, I got a numbered response from the Polish Wolf. Here is his 3rd and 4th points:

3. If anything, I prefer he do it with drones because at least a drone assassination is very hard to deny, and very hard to pin on ‘rogue elements’. When the president orders a drone strike, he takes personal responsibility for the outcome. That’s a big improvement over more traditional methods.

4. The reason liberals of your variety (I won’t even try to label them, because any label will be objectionable to you or to me) really oppose drones seems pretty simple: they lay bare the farce that is national sovereignty in the modern world. The idea that nations operate only inside their borders except in times of war has been absurd since at least the second world war and has never truly applied outside of Europe. But it is only the supposed violation of sovereignty that makes an American drone strike in Yemen any different than a Yemeni army action in Yemen with the same effect, or that makes providing weapons to a rebel group more frowned upon than providing weapons to a government. Since liberals o your sort cannot manage to come to terms with that, they must oppose the use of drones in warfare.

This issue is only beginning to gather steam. In my twitter feed this morning, I read a Reuters article titled As Drone Monopoly Frays, Obama Seeks Global Rules:

The United States was the first to use unmanned aircraft fitted with missiles to kill militant suspects in the years after the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.

But other countries are catching up. China’s interest in unmanned aerial vehicles was displayed in November at an air show . According to state-run newspaper Global Times, China had considered conducting its first drone strike to kill a suspect in the 2011 murder of 13 Chinese sailors, but authorities decided they wanted the man alive so they could put him on trial.

“People say what’s going to happen when the Chinese and the Russians get this technology? The president is well aware of those concerns and wants to set the standard for the international community on these tools,” said Tommy Vietor, until earlier this month a White House spokesman.

Obama wants to set the standard for the international community on these tools? I’m guessing the idea of allowing China and Russia (or Iran) to kill anyone they define as an imminent threat, anywhere in the world at anytime, isn’t very palatable for the Obama administration. But what right does any politician from America have to suggest other countries can’t do exactly what we are doing?

Here’s a crazy fucking idea Mr. President: if you didn’t want other regimes to have the power to kill anyone they feel threatened by anywhere in the world, then you shouldn’t have brazenly expanded that power for yourself.

But Democrats and their online cheerleaders don’t want that conversation, and we won’t have that conversation as long as progressive bloggers like Don Pogreba keep focused on the worst examples of what he tries to broadly paint as “modern conservatism”.

If progressives could avoid the easy bait provided by a fractured, dysfunctional Republican Party, they might see other things more clearly as well, like how modern liberalism, aka neoliberalism, is positioned to attack entitlements, and the only thing in the way is Republican obstructionism.

The issue of chaining the Consumer Price Index (CPI), for example, is being described by Gene Sperling, one of Obama’s chief economic advisers, as Obama’s preference and not just some carrot to entice Republicans.

Will progressives mobilize against policies that will significantly hurt the most vulnerable in this country? If you’re John Stauber, who recently described the progressive movement as a PR front for rich Democrats, the answer is no.

And that’s too bad, because the neoliberal agenda is tantamount to economic warfare, and after years of in-debting and impoverishing the populations of other countries, it’s finally within reach of significantly slashing benefits here at home.


  1. If we are now in perpetual campaign mode, and I believe we are, there is no time to debate ideology or issues. There’s no turning back, and no moving forward. There’s just MoveOn and FreedomWorks and all their variants. Occupy had one thing right, it identified the proper target. Wall Street controls. The rest is distraction and marketing.

  2. I was astonished by Stauber’s piece. It sounded like nothing less than an acute case of sour grapes, with the implication that no one was politically correct except he.

    Stauber’s an excellent writer and founded the Center for Media and Democracy, but left as its executive director four years ago.

  3. Craig Moore

    Lizard, perhaps you mean Gene Sperling, the architect of “Sequester.”

    As to the demonization you point to, it’s sole purpose is to unite in common knee jerk reaction a dissimilar collection of cacophonous, polyphonic, disharmonious voters who are mainly motivated by fear and hate of the anointed “demons” to vote for the alternative and accept the consequences. People like Messina craft the message and soldiers like Don salute and march forward shouting with their bullhorns.

    • lizard19

      thanks for the catch, I did mean Sperling.

    • *like*

  4. Craig Moore

    Well, you can kiss my blarney stones. ;)

    start at 0:30

    • Craig Moore

      That was for Rob.

  5. Big Swede

    “hive-deluded mind at fox news”?

    Really?

    http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/special-reports-landing-page/the-changing-tv-news-landscape/

    • JC

      You’re going to defer to Pew here? Really? Pew Research whose new president, Alan Murray, is the former managing editor of the Wall Street Journal (sister organization to Fox, and both owned by News Corp and Rupert Murdoch). You really think that Pew Research under Murray is going to give an unbiased report about Fox? Dream on.

      I think the “hive” has just translocatd a new queen to Pew, to continue the assimilation, judging by your Pew report.

      As to MSNBC’s “opinion” oriented format — as the Pew report pans it — anybody who watches MSNBC knows that it is mostly commentary and not hard news. It’s basically just another form of cable infotainment. What’s to be gained through more jibber-jabber about the faux right-center-left, Fox-CNN-MNBC mono-dimensional cable news triad??? Worthless drivel, most of it is.

      And lastly, anybody who thinks Pew is apolitical, or “independent” is deluded. Pew is nothing more than a long term right-wing project built on oil money (from sunoco). It’s main purpose is to infiltrate nonprofits (and move other foundations to do the same), restructure their missions and goals, and redirect their energies to areas that are less obstructive to extractive and capitalist industries. Subversive insurrection within the nonprofit world. I view Pew Research as just another manifestation of that mission.

      • Big Swede

        So JC, pray tell.

        What non-infiltrated, pro-obstructive to extractive/capitalist news source do you watch?

        • jack ruby

          Link tv?

          http://www.linktv.org/

        • JC

          I don’t watch TV anymore. Happiest day of my life when I took the cable box back, years ago.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Pages

  • Recent Comments

    Jon Tester’s G… on Senator Tester Backs Wall Stre…
    Digging Deeper: Exam… on A visit from a Montana Na…
    Washing Ton on A New Shelter for Vets or an E…
    Manitou springs on The Dark Side of Colorado
    C. Willie on American Poets: Robinson …
    C. Willie on American Poets: Robinson …
    bretagnebk on The Dark Side of Colorado
  • Recent Posts

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,636,078 hits
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,732 other followers

  • March 2013
    S M T W T F S
    « Feb   Apr »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Categories


%d bloggers like this: