Harry Reid shows us how it’s done; Barack Obama loses the Democratic nomination
April 3, 2007 in Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Iraq
by Jay Stevens
It’s time for the Senate to stand up and represent the American people.
President Bush, of course, has threatened to veto the recently passed Iraq War supplemental funding legislation that puts a timetable for American troop withdrawal from Iraq. This is the bill that most Americans want.
Harry Reid responded by co-sponsoring Russ Feingold’s bill to cut funding altogether for the war, and put it up for vote in the Senate.
If that vote comes to the Senate, it’s going to be gut-check time for the lawmakers. They’ll have to be bold, and either approve or disapprove of the war, once and for all, right next to their names for us all to remember and hold accountable. That is, knowing the popularity of the war with the electorate, it’s going to be very difficult for Senators up for election in 2008 or 2010 (if funding continues) to continue their support for Iraq.
Kos:
The Iraq Supplemental + benchmarks + withdrawal plan is extremely popular with voters. If Bush gives them the finger, it’ll give congressional Democrats more political leeway in approaches toward ending the war, up to and including defunding.
Meanwhile, Obama has just lost the Democratic primary. Kos says this little stunt doesn’t make Obama a “non-starter” for his primary vote, but it’s a monumental act of betrayal to the party, to the country, to the servicemen and -women serving in Iraq.
(Watch this video and tell me that the war’s worth it, right after you tell me what the h*ll it’s about.)
Wulfgar! — naturally – finds the proper emotional tone when considering Obama’s stupendous gaffe:
People are dying here. America is bleeding money here. The Deciderator wants that to continue such that he might secure his legacy by leaving this clusterfr@ck to his successor. More lives, more money, and so goes the circle of life, death and civil war in a country we have no reason to be in. And, on the one issue that matters most to the American people and America’s future, Barrack Ray Vaughn Obama has signed off on whatever Bush wants. I cannot, I will not, support this man for President.
Or take Colby’s perspective:
Yeah, that is the way to force the President to change his Iraq policy; issue completely empty threats that he doesn’t have to take seriously. Any decent parent could tell you that threats without follow-through are a useless way to change someone’s behavior. No wonder this President thinks he doesn’t answer to anyone, apparently he doesn’t have to!
Insane. If we’ve learned anything that past few years, it’s that “The Decider” doesn’t much care about pressure, or politics, or policy. Obama’s statement is a clear admission that he will, as the Democrats have done over and over, simply cave before the threat of the White House’s crude and illogical rhetoric.
This is a historically weak President, supporting and unpopular and profoundly wrong policy. If this isn’t the moment to stand up, when is?
Amen.
I flatter myself thinking Obama’s people are out there checking in on the blogosphere’s reaction to his unprincipled stand. But if you are, you all just got flamed by Montana Democrats. That’s bad news for you folks, because not only do we like backbone in our politicians, we’re a d*mn good barometer of how the country will fall. And this post is coming from a guy who was this close to backing you, early.
Obama, we’ve been hammering away at our representatives for years now to represent us for a change, and you’ve thrown it in our faces. Thanks. Good luck with that.
-
1
On the Iraq War, Congress, and the U.S. Constitution « 4&20 blackbirds
Pingback on Apr 4th, 2007 at 11:20 am
[…] Harry Reid shows us how it’s done; Barack Obama loses the Democratic nomination […]
-
2
Reconsidering Obama and the funding of the war « 4&20 blackbirds
Pingback on Apr 5th, 2007 at 3:06 pm
[…] Harry Reid shows us how it’s done; Barack Obama loses the Democratic nomination […]
-
3
Open thread: the Reid/Feingold Iraq bill « 4&20 blackbirds
Pingback on Apr 5th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
[…] Harry Reid shows us how it’s done; Barack Obama loses the Democratic nomination […]
Leave a comment Cancel reply
.Election Resources
- Denise Juneau for U.S. Senate
- Fact Check.org
- FEC Campaign Finance Reporting
- Follow the Money
- Montana PBS
- Montana Public Radio News Blog
- MT Campaign Reporting
- MT Goverment e-Calendar
- MT Legislature
- Open Congress
- Open Secrets
- PolitiFact
- Project Vote Smart
- Sunlight Campaign Ad Monitor
- Sunlight Foundation
Citizen's Info
- #OccupyMIssoula
- #occupyportland
- #occupyseattle
- #OccupyTogether
- #occupywallstreet
- A New Century of Forest Planning
- ACLU of Montana blog
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies
- Association of Alternative Newsweeklies
- Banktracker
- BLM Land Survey Information
- Buffalo's Fire
- Center for Budget & Policy Priorities
- Clark Fork Watershed Education Program
- Concerned Citizens Montana
- Cops and Courts
- CRMW's Regional Economies Assessment Database
- Dirty Oil Sands
- Donate to the Missoula Food Bank
- Donate to the Poverello Center
- EarmarkWatch.org
- FedSpending.org
- Good Jobs First
- Government News for Montana
- Guide to Montana Courts
- Hatewatch
- Headwaters Economics
- Headwaters News
- Health Reform Watch
- http://ncfp.wordpress.com/
- Immigration Blog
- John Adams' The Lowdown
- Kaiser Health News
- Keep It Rural Southwestern Montana
- MapLight.org
- MCAT Civic Channel 11 Schedule
- Media Matters
- Missoula City Council
- Missoula City/County Board Agendas and Minutes
- Missoula Consolidated Planning Board agendas and packets
- Missoula County Commissioners Weekly Agenda
- Missoula Independent
- Missoula Institute for Sustainable Transportation
- Missoula Neighborhoods
- Missoula OPG Calendar
- Missoula Public Library
- Missoula Red Tape
- MissoulaGov Listserv
- Missoulian
- Montana Budget and Policy Center
- Montana Capitol Report
- Montana Conservation Voters
- Montana Environmental Information Center
- Montana Food Bank Network
- Montana FWP Public Notices
- Montana Human Rights Network
- Montana Independent Living Action Alert
- Montana Innocence Project
- Montana Law Library blog
- Montana Medical Growers Association
- Montana Public Radio
- Montana Water
- MT Land Board
- MT Legislative Audit Reports
- MT Legislative Committee & Hearing Information
- MT Legislative Fiscal Division
- MT Legislative Fiscal Division
- MT Legislative Webpage
- New Progressive Alliance
- Northern Plains Resource Council
- Northern Rockies Independent Media
- Northern Rockies Independent Media Network
- Nortwest Digital Archives
- Project on Government Oversight
- Public Land/Water Access Association, Inc.
- Robert Reich
- Scholar as Citizen
- SCOTUS blog
- Senatus
- Smirking Chimp
- Sustainable Business Council
- Taxpayers for Common Sense
- The Burton K. Wheeler Center
- The Center for Public Integrity
- The Clark Fork Chronicle
- The Nation Institute
- The New Health Dialogue Blog
- The Policy Institute
- The Project for Excellence in Journalism
- The Tax Foundation
- Zeitlangers
Mountain Blogs
- .The.Banks.Account
- 2nd Grade Bike Rack
- 43rd State Blues
- A Secular Franciscan Life
- Alisia Duganz – MetaData
- aloneinaforest presents
- Beaverhead County Democratic Party
- Big Hole Trout
- Big Hole Watershed Committee grayling report
- Big Sky Blog
- Big Sky Democrat
- Bill LaCroix
- Billings Blog
- Billings Housing Market
- Bitterroot Badger's Bozeman Buddhist Blog
- Blue Oregon
- Bunk in the West
- Button Valley Bugle
- Buzztail
- Charley Carp's
- Clean Green Sustainable
- Cognitive Dissonance
- CosmicGarden
- D. Gregory Smith: From Here to Eternity
- Dark Acres
- Demarcated Landscapes
- dig this chick
- Discovering Urbanism
- DownWithTyranny!
- Duganz: A Heretic's life
- EcoRover
- Electric City Weblog
- F-Words
- Feral Cats of Freedom
- Flathead Memo
- Geo Fizz
- GeoPostings
- goddamnindependents
- GreaterFalls
- Hamm On Wry
- High Country News
- Hummingbirdminds
- Intelligent Discontent
- interested party
- Just Thoughts
- Karbon Kounty Moos
- Left in the West
- Livingston, I Presume
- Missoula Editor
- Missoulapolis
- Montana Legal Eagle's Blog
- Montana Main St.
- Montana Matters
- Montana Wildlife Gardener
- montanafesto
- Mountains, Plains & People
- mtpolitics.net
- Mudflats
- Naked but For a Loincloth
- Native American Netroots
- New West
- Night Vision Missoula
- Nils Ribi’s Blog
- Ninetynineweeks
- Northern Rockies Rising Tide
- Other Nations
- Out There with Tom
- Patia Stephens
- Piece Of Mind
- Political Game
- Pragmatic Revolt
- Prairie Mary
- Prairie Pedagogue
- Preserving the Beartooth Front
- Problembear
- Progressive Alaska
- Ragged Edge of the Universe
- Really?
- Reptile Dysfunction
- Savage Mama
- Shakespeare and Co.
- Speedkill
- Sporky
- Swanview Coalition
- The Buffalo Post
- The Hip Homemaker
- The Montana Cowgirl
- the Montana Maven
- The Odd Neighbor
- The Road Less Traveled
- The Western Word
- The Wildlife News
- This Montana Life
- thoughtstreaming
- Watermark
- West Fork Blues
- Western Democrat
- Wheaterville
- Wild Horse (and Burro) Warriors
- Wilder Than a Grizzly's Dream
- Wulfgar!'s
Political Blogs
Various & Sundry
- Big Sky Documentary Film Festival
- Counterpunch
- Good Food Store
- High Plains Films
- Honor the Fallen
- Jim Hightower
- Library of Congress Blog
- Margaret & Helen’s Blog
- Missoula Community Food Co-op
- Missoula Urban Demonstration Project
- Montana Office of Tourism
- Mother Jones
- North Missoula Community Development Corporation
- Orion Magazine
- Slog
- The American Prospect
- The Atlantic
- The Awl
- The Economist
- The Hill
- The Nation
- Wild West Institute
- Wildlife Film Festival
Meta
Archives
- October 2015
- September 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
Pages
Recent Comments
Miles on A New Shelter for Vets or an E… success rate for In… on Thirty years ago ARCO killed A… Warrior for the Lord on The Dark Side of Colorado Linda Kelley-Miller on The Dark Side of Colorado Dan on A New Shelter for Vets or an E… Former Prosecutor Se… on Former Chief Deputy County Att… JediPeaceFrog on Montana AG Tim Fox and US Rep.… -
Recent Posts
Blog Stats
- 1,696,400 hits
-
Join 2,733 other subscribers
Categories
April 3, 2007 at 7:23 am
Bravo, good roundup. Nice to see such a strong reaction to such an insulting statement.
April 3, 2007 at 8:25 am
Right now, only 28% of Americans favor a move to cut-off funding. However, over 60% oppose the war.
The Democrats would be better served by impeaching this President (and VP) and then withdrawing troops on their own terms.
April 3, 2007 at 9:20 am
John Edwards, anyone?
April 3, 2007 at 10:37 am
Right now, only 28% of Americans favor a move to cut-off funding. However, over 60% oppose the war.
The Democrats would be better served by impeaching this President (and VP) and then withdrawing troops on their own terms.
I think Kos is right when he says that, if the President vetoes the funding bill that sets a withdrawal timeline, a vote on yanking funding will seem more reasonable, given the rogue President.
Even if it fails, it makes the possiblity more real by pushing the envelope on what Congress can realistically consider.
As for impeachment…well…it’s time-consuming and iffy. I think the President should be impeached; but are there enough votes?
April 3, 2007 at 11:49 am
The democrats either have to s**t or get off the pot. Impeach Bush and cut off the funding…NOW!!!
Figure the odds, the gutless leadership would rather keep up the incessant whining from dusk to dawn rather than take any action that could be the least bit confrontational. This is the leadership the democrats say the American people elected to get the job done? That weasel Hairy Reed makes me want to throw up the most, closely followed by any you name him or her democrat in Congress.
April 3, 2007 at 12:13 pm
Let’s see. If we successfully impeach Bush we’re stuck with, uh, President Cheney?
I’m not sure he’d be any worse. Actually I’d rather see both these rascals canned, leaving us with (drum-roll) President Pelosi! Yay!
April 3, 2007 at 12:42 pm
I think Ms. Botox would probably make a good president. Of what, I don’t know. She does represent the San Francisco area, so with all the deviancy that goes on there, I’m sure there is something she would find comfortable presiding over. You know, something similar to the job she has now, as leader of the House democrats.
April 3, 2007 at 9:29 pm
Seems like what you’re interested in, Jay, is making sure that the Dems no way no how get any political capital out of this. And you’re pissed at Obama for telling it like it is because if you think Pelosi is about to sponsor a vote on cutting off all the funding and therefore endanger her majority (not to mention probably lose the vote), well, you’re not watching very closely.
Could be there are more important things than the race for the Democratic nomination and they might require greater strategic tact. Pickett’s Charge went badly the last time I checked.
You deceive yourself if you think the Senate managed to get this through based on anything except the expectation that it would be vetoed and only further sully Bush. From the beginning, the timetable has been about politics and the endgame, once the vote in the Senate was cast, has been easy to see because there will be more opportunities to press for a timetable. Not like this President is going to remove the
troops under any circumstances anyway.
While that sucks, you might want to resist the urge to immolate someone with the frankness to say what everybody knows instead of sticking relentlessly on message. I’m holding out for politics with substance and that requires something more than repeating tired talking points.
April 3, 2007 at 11:32 pm
I don’t believe it’s politically astute to cave into a President with less than a 30 percent approval rating. Reid is a smart political animal; what’s needed here to send a message to Bush about consequences. The plan voted on by the House and Senate has all the elements that are popular — that’s why the Senate Republicans rolled over on it and are going to let the Prez take the hit for it. Even a failed vote will tarnish those that continue to support the President. In the end, the negotiation will have to be over concrete timetables, not if there are timetables.
And how could these talking points be “tired”? They’re only now being used by Democrats.
I’m immolating Obama, not for not being anti-war enough, but for going against party leadership on a crucial issue requiring unity and backing a popular stance. Tacking with Bush on foreign policy has been a disaster; and now it’s unpopular. So…why?
April 4, 2007 at 6:35 am
It’s just political theater and you’re pissed because Obama flubbed his lines. But the show will go on and no new ending is in the works.
The Dems already set the timetable as late as people in Washington effectively seem to be able to think, near the end of the next election cycle. I guess they could move them back until after the election or demand some less drastic trajectory but then that would also yield a later withdrawal.
As for the talking points business, I’m betraying my general ambivalence about politics in the age of endless repetition. All talking points sound tired to me, just as soon as I hear them. This may in fact be a metaphor that is itself worn out and I shall endeavor to come up with some new way to characterize words chosen for their effect rather than meaning.
Overall, I am betraying an even greater indifference because, while I am glad the Dems got this legislation through, I don’t believe this war is about to end. In fact, I think there is a fairly good chance not even the election will do that but certainly Bush will not withdraw. New leadership is the only way out, and it will have to be someone with the frankness to say what everybody knows, the wisdom to find choose another strategy and the humility to admit the mistakes that both of those things will mean. Saying what he thinks instead of what he’s been programmed to is a demonstration of the qualities of an effective executive, which is after all what the president is.
April 4, 2007 at 9:03 am
Fair enough. Point well taken.
Tho’ I quibble that Obama’s statements fulfill your hope for “new leadership.” His stance is the old, roll-over-whenever-a-Republican-suggests-you’re-not-strong-enough-on-defense act, hardly a new line of thought. Running away from your values because you might appear weak, IMHO, is not the quality for an effective executive. But Obama’s “real” motives are moot. We’ll just have to see how he handles himself in the near future.
March 7, 2008 at 11:25 am
boy, you guys sure called this one!
HAHAHAHA… !
March 7, 2008 at 3:59 pm
Last I checked, McCain leads Obama in the state.