Tester Wins by Breaking the Rules

by Matt Singer

If you were to sit down and write an article about how to win a statewide election in Montana, you would probably think the Tester strategy was suicide.

Tester lost Yellowstone County, albeit narrowly, meaning that we now have two statewide officeholders who failed to carry Billings (the other being Brad Johnson).

Tester didn’t come close to carrying rural Montana. In fact, rural Montana went pretty overwhelmingly for Burns.

Tester didn’t win by carrying senior citizens — regular voters — by a wide margin. In fact, according to exit polls, he narrowly lost them.

Tester won by putting up a huge margin in Missoula County, turning out his base, relying on urban progressives, and young voters.

In other words, despite the biographical similarities, Schweitzer and Tester could not have won two more different campaigns. Schweitzer received 61% of the vote in Missoula, carrying a 13,000 vote margin. Tester received 64% of the vote in Missoula, carrying a nearly 15,000 vote margin — despite lower turnout in 2006. Meanwhile, in a decent example of how small county returns came in, look at Musselshell. Schweitzer pulled 37% of the vote. Tester came in six points lower — at 31%. Similar trends occured all over rural Montana.

So, let’s cut to exit polls. In 2004, Schweitzer did well among male voters, getting by with virtually no gender gap. Tester had one, albeit small. Schweitzer got 52% of young voters. Tester pull 56%. Schweitzer got 69% of the votes of voters over 65. Tester got merely 48%.

Schweitzer posted his best numbers among the working class ($15,000-$30,000 a year in income) with 62% of the vote. Tester drew only 51% of this crowd.

In 2004, Schweitzer won the rural vote 50%-48%. Tester lost it this year 53%-45%. Schweitzer won both “Urban West” and “Eastern Montana” while Brown won “Rural West.” Tester only won the Urban West, won it by a wider margin and its share of the electorate increased.

In other words, Tester just may be the first urban elected official to ever come out of Montana. He got elected with a polarized electorate in a state where a polarized electorate should have helped the Republican. He also made big gains in terms of cementing young Montanans as Democrats — something that Schweitzer has done well since winning election.

Finally, Democratic claims regarding early vote and same-day registration appear to be vindicated. These two changes in election law may very well have changed the fate of this election.
It appears that legislative races did not go as well as we might have hoped, but there are a lot of signs of life in those down ballot races.

About these ads

  1. Thanks, Stan Jones!

  2. Your welcome.

  3. Truth Hurts?

    Fair and interesting (balanced?) analysis of the vote. Kids don’t try this at home, he is a professional. Yet keep in mind with the novelty of this race these results are less than applicable to future elections. Jon Tester was the “I’m not Conrad” candidate and Conrad was Conrad, the ideal opponent to have. So I rather doubt Jon created thousands of new democrats (urban or otherwise). Granted he did gather in new prospects. However thousands of the Tester votes were in fact “My God anyone but Conrad” votes. If you doubt me just look at the Rehberg – Lindeen vote. She barely outpolled Tracy Who? from 2004. The lesson here is that to win, a party must either present a decent candidate or be fortunate enough to be running against a fool.

  4. Yeah, I was thinking of comparing Tester’s votes to Lindeen’s…who has the time to do this? What was Lindeen’s support in Missoula?

    Still, the thing is, we’ve got to be poised to take advantage of a bad candidate or a vacant seat. Rehberg, while seemingly as dirty as Burns, manages to keep things under wraps and his mouth shut.

    If he runs for Senate, tho…Lindeen has laid some good groundwork to either run again or pave the way for the next Dem.

  1. 1 What was at stake in Montana… « 4&20 blackbirds

    […] Burns really didn’t have any net support to speak of, and while I think the blogs and their fundraising efforts helped Jon out more in the primary, I think we did help whip up a frenzy in the cities. And like Matt said, Tester may have won on huge turnout in the state’s urban areas. […]

  2. 2 2006 winners and losers « 4&20 blackbirds

    […] Winner: Jon Tester. It wasn’t the election he was shooting for. But he ran a decent campaign largely on the strength of his character and experience, and he won just enough votes in the rural areas to allow the cities to carry him into office. […]

  3. 3 Dave Budge .com » Purple State, Purple Country

    […] There was at least one notable thing coming from Matt Singer (who has bucked the trend of average lefties and been relatively gracious) in his post titled Tester Wins By Breaking the Rules Tester won by putting up a huge margin in Missoula County, turning out his base, relying on urban progressives, and young voters. […]

  4. 4 Cowboy Up: Montana’s Weird and Wild Senate Race

    […] his 2006 victory not to the large crop of Montana voters who look and live a lot like him, but to a patchwork coalition of college kids, transplants, American Indians, and retirees. When the final votes were counted, […]




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Pages

  • Recent Comments

    Big Swede on Beyond Being Thankful
    Steve W on Chuck Schumer Says Democrats B…
    evdebs on Beyond Being Thankful
    Big Swede on Chuck Schumer Says Democrats B…
    Steve W on Chuck Schumer Says Democrats B…
    Big Swede on Beyond Being Thankful
    Big Swede on Chuck Schumer Says Democrats B…
  • Recent Posts

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,537,405 hits
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,323 other followers

  • November 2006
    S M T W T F S
    « Oct   Dec »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  
  • Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,323 other followers

%d bloggers like this: