Paper prints Pops’ baseball letter
So my old man did it. He sent in his letter, and our local newspaper dutifully printed it:
To the Editor of THE EAGLE:
With the recent kick-off of the Art of the Game and in an effort to add to Pittsfield's rich baseball heritage, I think we should institute new rules to the game calling for offensive and defensive teams, to move in the same direction as the NFL. After all, now that NFL players have to take a break to take on oxygen after a 20-yard-run, should we penalize our baseball players by making them play both sides?
We should have nine players who only play defense, which would eliminate having a good batter who cannot catch a fly ball on the field. The good batters can all be on the nine-man offensive team and flail away at the ball. Fans would love the additional offense and marvel at good fielding plays. After all, wouldn't this just be the natural progression after the initiation of the designated hitter?
As this concept is adopted in the Major Leagues, we can all proudly say it started here in Pittsfield, just as baseball itself started in 1791. Ah the Glory!
I’ll keep you posted on the reactions. Baseball talk is the crack of New England: rest assured we’ll see some steamy reaction to this epistle. Heck, I might even have to create a “curmudgeon” tag just to track the discussion. (I just hope no angry football players ambush pop outside the A&P.)
By the way, how fast did the Eagle print that letter? That was fast! They must know a good baseball brouhaha when they see one.
June 23, 2006 at 4:33 pm
That would be an interesting idea…
I think I like baseball the way it is. The players abilties in one area may be invaluable, but they may pose a disadvantage in others. It keeps thing interesting.
June 24, 2006 at 9:51 pm
Okay — this letter is satire. My old man is making fun of lazy athletes; it was mentioned in the previous post about the old man, but I should probably mention it again here in the comments…
My dad is joking.